Mithorium

8 ms·

31.
by Mithorium 9y ago
Well, if people decide to use it that way nobody can stop them. In my opinion, that would be an inefficient way of using the network, since if you pay with XLM today you need to first buy some, taking a loss on the conversion since you have
32.
by Mithorium 9y ago
Stellar isn't a direct replacement per-se, it's fast and has near zero transaction fees, but the lumens themselves were not intended to be used as a medium of transaction, only to have a token amount to pay the miniscule fees with
33.
by Mithorium 9y ago
tldr: >Parity’s stance is this: It is our hope that the community would get behind a rescue of these funds to help all the users that we can.
34.
by Mithorium 9y ago
It's a credit card problem, even if the donation is in crypto, the patrons need to buy that, and unless they're using cash or direct bank transfer its probably going to be by card. The only way to lower the fixed fees is to convin
35.
by Mithorium 9y ago
Think about what that means. If I issue my own currency and "sell" it to myself, any amount I bought would be free
36.
by Mithorium 9y ago
I haven't used it much but from the pricing page it seems affordable enough. There is also a calculator at the bottom for big apps where you can estimate how much it will cost for the plan at scale https://firebase.google.co
37.
by Mithorium 9y ago
http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/pow-cheapest/ regarding proof of stake
38.
by Mithorium 9y ago
Will this be able to handle live streaming, for example using OBS?
39.
by Mithorium 9y ago
In a word: Yes
40.
by Mithorium 9y ago
I was wondering that too, the best I could come up with is that the unused part of the rectangle represents the remainder we haven't "pulled down" yet, so in the first iteration, 0.17 I don't think its important to the c
41.
by Mithorium 9y ago
True, I imagine a lot of software wouldn't know how to handle an email without a dot in the domain part That and apparently ICANN would frown upon such an implementation [1] [1] https://www.icann.org/news/announcem
42.
by Mithorium 9y ago
How about setting MX records for .google so you can have name@google emails
43.
by Mithorium 9y ago
yep! ;)
44.
by Mithorium 9y ago
>lotharbot Confirmed, robots are replacing men
45.
by Mithorium 9y ago
I wish more people were like you. If everyone tried to assume the best of others until proven otherwise instead of assuming the worst we would all be much happier as a group
46.
by Mithorium 9y ago
There's a grocery store across the street from me, connected by an underground mall. I don't even need to go outside to get to groceries, much less get in a car
47.
by Mithorium 10y ago
I agree, if it can live in a byte buffer and not crash the transport mechanism or hash function then it's good enough for me
48.
by Mithorium 10y ago
I noticed that GCE instances only offer 1GB of network egress, and then $0.12/GB thereafter, which seems rather steep. Is GCE only meant for use as a CPU engine/internal node of some kind? Is there a different product meant for ed
49.
by Mithorium 10y ago
so this free* f1-micro instance of GCE, with the most basic usage of say, running a slack bot/nginx/random test projects, without the need for dynamic scaling, would be functionally identical to a VM anywhere else? can I keep it o
50.
by Mithorium 10y ago
Now that you bring it up I realize that I am also running a massive trade deficit with my local grocery store. This does not seem fair, I should impose a 30% tariff on all food imported from the grocery, that will show them for subsidizing
51.
by Mithorium 10y ago
I like the part where Alexa asked him what's next
52.
How Tumblr uses \0 in the output of meta tags(dudewheresmybackslash0.tumblr.com)
88 points by Mithorium 13y ago|18 comments
53.
by Mithorium 14y ago
This isn't news. Chat and messaging are one and the same. You can message anyone, and you can migrate conversations arbitrarily between the chat and message UI, or even both at the same time. If you message someone who you don't have good r