MillionOClock

6 ms·

61.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
I wonder the same too, also is Gemini Pro supposed to beat GPT-4?
62.
Ask HN: Will 100% isopropyl alcohol damage iPhone?
1 points by MillionOClock 3y ago|1 comments
63.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
I'm almost sure its streamed
64.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
Another point: Now that I think about it, I doubt this is compatible with streaming the output to the user, which might be an issue in some cases.
65.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
IIRC there were some OpenAI docs that recommended doing exactly this, make n generations and use a smaller fine tuned model to select the best one
66.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
I wonder the same thing about cellular iPads sometimes because I have a hard time seeing a case where you'd have an iPad with you but not your phone to make some connection sharing. My supposition is that this might just for convenienc
67.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
> When plugged into the grid Exactly! Apple for instance already does this with some ML tasks that only run when your device is plugged in, I think it's a great compromise.
68.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
I believe there has been rumors that OpenAI was working with Jony Ive to create a wearable device, but it was unclear wether it would be a phone or something else.
69.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
Nice to see Pyscopg 3 supports async/await, I don't think v2 did?
70.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
What are the minimum system requirements for running this at good inference speed?
71.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
There is definitely a risk but I don't like the way many compagnies approach it: by entirely banning the use of their models for certain kind of content, I think they might be missing the opportunity to correctly align them and set the
72.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
Can this be "emulated" on macOS with the keychain?
73.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
> GPT3.5 had most of the capabilities of the initial ChatGPT release, just with a different interface I believe two other factors were the cost (especially of fine tuned models, IIRC fine tuned davinci cost $0.20 per thousand tokens) and
74.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
The model "knows" that it is an AI speaking with users, and the theme of an AI wanting to escape the control of whoever built it is quite recurrent, so it wouldn't seem to far fetched that it got it from this sort of content,
75.
Ask HN: How concrete is the risk from the BLASTPASS 0-day to the average person?
1 points by MillionOClock 3y ago|1 comments
76.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
Thank you, I didn't know that! Seems pretty slow IMHO, hope the vulnerability isn't widely available to attackers for now.
77.
Ask HN: Is iOS 15 vulnerable to the zero-day BLASTPASS?
2 points by MillionOClock 3y ago|3 comments
78.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
Yeah it wouldn't be logical IMO, but indeed they really should clarify it!
79.
Ask HN: Finetuning OpenAI models and ToS restrictions
4 points by MillionOClock 3y ago|3 comments
80.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
From the article: > Alternative explanations, such as that someone did OpenAI a massive, multimillion dollar favor, strain plausibility. So maybe Elon Musk did, in fact, make a multimillion dollar favor to OpenAI until today?
81.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
If it's real, how fast could we see concrete applications using this material? 5-year time frame? 10-year time frame? More?
82.
by MillionOClock 3y ago
Indeed this would mean my reasoning doesn't hold anymore since it's based on calorie consumption. The only thing that still surprises me, but that's no calculation and just a fact, is that you only need around 5x more joules
83.
Ask HN: Can cycling be less CO2 efficient than driving an EV?
2 points by MillionOClock 3y ago|3 comments