MikkoFinell

22 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   > The presence or absence of consciousness could be empirically verified and experimentally tested. How? > consciousness is not an abstract idea, it belong to the category of biological processes. Okay, describe the experiment which c
2. 182.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   I didn't ask whether consciousness is abstract crap, nor did I ask about vision subsystems (which aren't even unique to brains), nor did I ask you to explain the whole process of development from fertilized egg to me. Well, unless
3. 183.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   What you subjectively experience in the morning is not proof of anything. Since you continue to evade the question, I will only ask once more time: Describe the experiment that demonstrates the existence of consciousness in a manner which i
4. 184.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   You said Nothing exist unless experimentally proven and replicated. Describe the experiment that proves you are conscious.
5. 185.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   Don't change the subject. Explain how consciousness arises, and describe an experiment that replicates it.
6. 186.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   Okay. Your consciousness doesn't exist. Plz go away you scary philosophical zombie!
7. 187.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   Also clang warns "using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses".
8. 188.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   If you autosign every commit then you aren't validating anything anyway. All that means is you have another mindless process running automatically in the background. So what's your point?
9. 189.▲
   by MikkoFinell 10y ago

   Linus Torvalds, the creator of Git, says that signing every commit is stupid. http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/GPG-signing-for-git-commit-t...