Meph504

27 ms·

241.
by Meph504 5y ago
Can spam doesn't really have teeth, I would recommend changing the email on your account.
242.
by Meph504 5y ago
So, does no one else see this as a referral gimmick site? I don't see anything on this site that is really buy for life.
243.
by Meph504 5y ago
It goes month to month after 12 months, it doesn't stop, but I grant you sure they could make their own deals sound less appealing, but without a law forcing them too, they aren't going to. This right below the button you press to
244.
by Meph504 5y ago
Yes, the annual plan paid monthly cost more, Adobe wants the money up front, so you pay more for speadinng the payments over a year.
245.
by Meph504 5y ago
It means what it means in almost ever contract you sign for a subscription service. You agree to purchase a year of service, and pay for that monthly. It is a very common practice across multiple industries. If they believed that they were
246.
by Meph504 5y ago
it clearly says "annual plan, paid monthly" which is what you are signing up for, a year long obligation, with installment payments. if you click the drop down, it shows you not only your other options but also the prices. https:
247.
by Meph504 5y ago
A fee is acceptable, if the consumer agrees to it, adobe wants people to pay their agreed on contract, but offer people a discount of 50% of their remaining obligation. This seems pretty fair to me, when you signed up for the contract, thos
248.
by Meph504 5y ago
https://i.imgur.com/CZSCvw8.png If you click the options you can see the prices. This is a common practice, I feel like there are people are really trying to make this a bigger deal than it is.
249.
by Meph504 5y ago
This is singular the worst way to share information, he look here is a link to someone twitter feed, where you can read them talk about how they didn't read their contract for like 40 tweets. They signed up for an annual subscription w
250.
by Meph504 6y ago
I do find it funny, that you ask for citation, then to base your disagreement on your personal perspective. Do you have any supporting information aside from your personal viewpoint? [citation] https://www.cnbc.com/2020&#x2F
251.
by Meph504 6y ago
Well, I think in general, tech politically leaning more progressive makes a lot of sense, tech isn't dominated by those that are conservative by nature, tech in general is meant to change things, and not hold on to a conservative view.
252.
by Meph504 6y ago
Please stop saying things like "big tech" like it is a single entity, these are companies and the question is, should a company get to decide who uses their platform for crowdfunding. Many of us here build things, and I know I per
253.
by Meph504 6y ago
Again I have to disagree with your assessment of 365. We have over 35k of files and don't seem to have trouble managing them across hundreds of employees. Of course we took the time to organize and manage permissions before hand. And m
254.
by Meph504 6y ago
Not sure what if I agree with either of your accessment of Google technology working better, and a more certainly don't agree with the word not being a good collaboration tool. I do agree that Google support isn't worth shit, and
255.
by Meph504 6y ago
Being profitable doesn't mean Google wants to stay in the business or that they are investing or innovating the product. Take Google apps (or its name of the week) and compare it to M365 It becomes clear they aren't staying compet
256.
by Meph504 6y ago
Came here to say Just this, it comes off as bitter and juvenile. No faster way to insure I keep my distance.
257.
by Meph504 6y ago
I really feel like Google wants out of this business, but doesn't want the stink of yet another killed off product, little else makes sense to me. They put so much effort establishing the market, and then just let it die on the vine, b
258.
by Meph504 6y ago
From the banks perspective to make the money back, that it takes for a lot of people to payback their student loans, means they end up charging massive interest. I don't like to see people placed in a financial situation that is a mass
259.
by Meph504 6y ago
What villainy? The terms are clear, the real issue is how many people take on such massive debt without reading the terms or having a plan other than "it will work out."
260.
by Meph504 6y ago
then all student loans would be be via the government, as why would any financial institution loan the money at 0% even more so now, with the level of default that high? Is that possible, certainly, is there enough will from the people of t
261.
by Meph504 6y ago
I'm sorry I take issue with these articles written from the perspective of they are a victim. They took $78k in loans to get a degree whose prospective returns were abysmal. They made the choice to defer resolving their debts, and let
262.
by Meph504 6y ago
I've had it happen immediately a lot. Ubisoft and jimmyjohns both had issues with it. I love when people argue that it isn't valid even after you contact support. Generally a sign I don't want to do business with them.
263.
by Meph504 6y ago
I always baffles me when I encounter a service that uses a different validator for sign up than sign in. Firstly, why write this twice. Secondly, it can cause so many headaches. the one I run into a lot is a + in an email address. I like t
264.
by Meph504 6y ago
have you actually tried to use their support, it was a single guy, who wasn't helpful, when I asked for a different rep, he copped an attitude. I still use bitwarden for personal use, but I didn't find the product (2 years ago) to
265.
by Meph504 6y ago
Overly opinionated narrowly scoped, with a click bait title. Of course the web has changed, someone of us have been around to remember the web before javascript. Before flash, before frameworks. take this same argument an apply it to cars,
266.
by Meph504 6y ago
God this guy, loves to drone on, Just because someone can make a successful product/company doesn't mean they are worldly or wise. This seems to demonstrate that, and honestly, this sort of droning on would give me pause to invest
267.
by Meph504 6y ago
In the US you can, as long as it isn't a "public performance" (there is a lot written on how to define this from a legal perspective) or any other commercial sense, I.E. Playing it in your business. The exception is playing t
268.
by Meph504 6y ago
If you aren't streaming you have no responsibility to safe guard the copyright for someone who does, it isn't a copyright violation until someone publishes it, and that copyright violation is on the publisher. He knowingly played
269.
by Meph504 6y ago
Or maybe people just didn't think it was relevant.
270.
by Meph504 6y ago
So most of these application including SharpApp are now being effected by Microsoft's choice to prevent blocking their telemetry in the host file. Basically, if you attempt to add any of their IPs or Domains, to the host file, when you

More ›