Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Mawr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
121.
▲
by
Mawr
6mo ago
That's so incredibly reductive, that I'd go ahead and call it plain wrong. "Caused by a human" is the lowest tier, first base human instinct analysis of any accident, and as such, unless proven otherwise, can be discarde
122.
▲
by
Mawr
6mo ago
> aka can a man pick up women via juggling? Sure: "Hey babe, wanna juggle my balls?". Works every time.
123.
▲
by
Mawr
6mo ago
Your "large area" is actually tiny, and the solution is to... not go there. Yeah, all you have to do is not go to a very specific tiny area in Ukraine. I think that's quite easily manageable. As usual, when such things are me
124.
▲
by
Mawr
6mo ago
This technique has been used in the search for the crashed MH370 flight - https://youtu.be/Y5K9HBiJpuk?t=2847 .
125.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
There's even more to it — real conversations are interactive, so if a statement causes confusion, it can be cleared up immediately. Forum posts, however, must stand alone for the most part. You probably also know the person you're
126.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
An even better version is to do away with the parking lot part and just have the trees.
127.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
So upgrade to 1.25? What reason could you possibly have to be so far behind? I can understand staying one version behind latest, to not be exposed to brand new bugs, which do happen, but staying two versions behind is pointless.
128.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> The version is the minimum version your project can be compiled with. No, it's the minimum version my project is tested with. > This means when you put a version like 1.25.7, you are deciding for everyone that imports you, tr
129.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> Words that are acronyms or initialisms (like API, URL or HTTP) should use a consistent case within the identifier. So, for example, apiKey or APIKey are conventional, but ApiKey is not. This rule also applies to ID when it is used as s
130.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> The first thing that I dislike about this is that it encourages thinking of semicolons being inserted instead of statements being terminated It might, but that's irrelevant since you never think about semicolons in Go at all. >
131.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
The "mess" being a massive reduction in harmful particulates?
132.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
Pedestrian mortality at 20mph vs 30mph is also vastly different: ~10% vs ~25% [1]. Also, see the graphs at [2]. [1]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22935347/ [2]: https://data.bikeleague.org/new-nhtsa-
133.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> As the EU continues its course to ban the sale of ICE cars by 2035, the argument of "fewer cars make for cleaner air" is gradually losing weight. Complete nonsense I'm afraid. An EV is about 50% cleaner and way quieter.
134.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
The starting point is anti-anything-but-a-car, so it's understandable that in the process of getting to any sort of parity you'd feel like it's "harassment". It's like claiming getting rid of slavery is "h
135.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
The difference in severity of a crash between a car and a bicycle is on the order of 20x. Are you seeing 20x more agressive cyclists than motorists? Anyhow, talking about the hospitalization rate without the mortality rate is very odd a
136.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
What a ridiculous claim. You're either deluded or outright lying.
137.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> Parts of the GC language crowd in particular have come to hold some false optimistic beliefs about how well a GC can handle allocations. Yep, the idea is "we've made allocations fast, so allocate away!". But that's
138.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
This is very dependent on the environment. I would not be so confident saying this about the USA in particular. If you can stick to at least half-decent dedicated cycling infrastructure separated from cars, sure. If riding alongside traff
139.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
That combined with the parent's post is, perhaps counterintuitively, somewhat concerning. The proper technique for yielding to pedestrians wishing to cross is to start slowing down early, as if you were planning to stop before the cros
140.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> I sometimes pace them to act as a moving shield. Yep, similar concept to using pedestrians crossing the road as shields. Cars reliably yield for them, not so much for cyclists. > not even eye contact Okay, DO NOT rely on eye contact
141.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
In theory, it depends. In practice, slamming on your brakes is the correct call 99% of the time. To a large extent that is because of the "competent driver" part. I'd expect 80%+ of drivers to consider themselves just that, w
142.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
Could you briefly explain in simple terms, why I as a user would care about any of that? I want stuff to work. With Wayland, it largely doesn't. I don't terribly care about the semantics of it.
143.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
This reads like AI/FSD-bro speak: "no, that's all old news, you clearly haven't tried the new cutting edge model/build bro! it's all fixed now!". > Wayland security Okay, that's great, but why woul
144.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> It performs better than Go > and its optimising compiler and GCs blow Go out of the water without breaking a sweat. Well, dandy! Since the performance gap is that big, it should be trivial to get hard data backing that up. Mind link
145.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
Post benchmarks. No, ones where you use 20x the memory of Rust to do the same job 1% faster don't count.
146.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
Ok, which one do I choose then, with what configuration? How much time do I need to spend on this research? How do I verify that they are actually better ? Is the overall performance of my program better ? Because that's what I care
147.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> I would say most of online comments about Java's GC are long outdated. They are not. Feel free to look up literally any half-decent benchmarks. If Java's on par or better than any other language of note, check the memory usag
148.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
No, not just like. You're downplaying significant differences between the two that do in fact matter. So much so in fact, that you're just wrong. Stop spreading misinformation.
149.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
> Why would anyone create a new language now? Same reason you'd ever create a new language — to start anew, breaking free from the shackles of backwards compatibility of the old language, having learned the lessons of the past. The
150.
▲
by
Mawr
7mo ago
Yeah, but you probably don't walk along a highway every day to get your groceries, do you. The closer the traffic gets to where people live, the lower the speed limit, and the more relevant the loudness of an engine. Another factor is
More ›