MaupitiBlue

24 ms·

61.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Haven't read the opinion, but I'd anticipate that this will be reversed on appeal. My guess is that this was either an Obama or Clinton judge. Both my Crim Pro and Con Law professors skipped border search cases and summed them up
62.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
> Does it not concern you in the slightest, that when they've ended up speaking to higher and higher up people in the various organisations that they literally don't know why the algorithm decided the way it did? No, I wouldn’t
63.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
“Damn these brown people, LGBTQ, women for demanding a seat at the table.” Maybe if they earned it instead of demanding it they’d be taken seriously?
64.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Woz and DHH both seemed to think filing jointly should be determinative or at least relevant.
65.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
And if lenders based their credit decisions on the spouse’s creditworthiness, someone else would whine about that. The sense of entitlement that’s taken hold of the world is dismaying. If you don’t like the terms Apple / GS are offerin
66.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Why do they think filing a joint return is relevant?
67.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
“failure to provide adequate resources” So you’re confirming Microsoft’s point that Linux on the desktop provides no cost advantage? Combine that with OpenOffice’s Word 6 level UI, and it’s understandable why they went back.
68.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
This is pathetic. A grown man whining to somebody’s mom because he was dumb enough to mail something of value to a random person on the internet.
69.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Because the goal was to be realistic, not to assuage white guilt.
70.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
The whining and expectation that big brother swoop in and make everything right.
71.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
They are public. You can always go to the courthouse and use one of the computers to download documents for free. Also, PACER bills quarterly, and your first $50 is free. Of course, if you are a party to the case, you can download for fre
72.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Like Hertz and Avis and Budget aren’t already established brands in the fleet financing, servicing, and dispatch business.
73.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Reviewing their social media.
74.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
I’m reluctant to take it, but then I wonder if a few of my close relatives have already taken it, isn’t the horse mostly out of the barn already?
75.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Zeal of the convert. Good analogy.
76.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Being highly political seems to be most concentrated in the young. Once you hit your mid 30s and have a few kids you learn to have a little perspective and not get so caught up in it. The ones that stay political are either people trying t
77.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Dragon legal’s primary advantage is that it handles citation formatting. I don’t think I’ve ever come across a legal term it didn’t know (maybe dépeçage).
78.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
> legal obligation for profit maximization Not the law. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/26/the-shareholder-v...
79.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
It delayed nuclear proliferation without harming a single soldier or civilian. If that’s an act of war, then I guess I’m a war monger.
80.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Who knew it ever stopped being a thing?
81.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Whatever happened to f’edcompany.com?
82.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Have you actually been to SF? Nobody makes these people do anything. In any sane polis, you'd institutionalize the ones that require it, and run the rest off. SF's leaders pride themselves on adopting the opposite approach.
83.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
The cars seem to be much less of a problem than the limitless hordes of insane drug addicts and their excrement.
84.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
> if any one person at Apple (including the CEO) is not at all times acting solely to maximize the profit to their shareholders they will be replaced by someone who will. Google apple largest shareholders
85.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Biden has come out against the trade war. “I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what? They’re not competition for us,” he added.
86.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Let’s not forget Marriot’s capitulation last year.
87.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Correct. Many factors contributed, but there was one prevailing factor - the defective design of MCAS.
88.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
I beat you with a little Ford, but couldn’t agree more. Everyone needs to turn off Facebook and take a deep breath. The sun will come out tomorrow.
89.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Take a deep breath. Despite what you may see on TV, it’s not the end of the world. “whether the US president is above the law or not” Think of the situation as a poorly defined edge case. The Constitution does not say that laws don’t apply
90.
by MaupitiBlue 7y ago
Bob Woodward was right. Much of the left is simply “unhinged” over Trump. Some of the antiObama stuff was bad, but the last few years have been pretty incredible.

More ›