MattRix

28 ms·

451.
by MattRix 3y ago
There’s also all the media to go along with them.
452.
by MattRix 3y ago
ya uh I think the whole “selling the game to microsoft” thing might have affected those plans ;)
453.
by MattRix 3y ago
Many high quality human programmers could go off and make a very good program from a simple description/prompt. I see no reason an LLM couldn’t do the same. On top of that, there’s no reason an AI couldn’t ask additional questions to c
454.
by MattRix 3y ago
nope I don’t remember Ceylon or any of the other frameworks you mentioned… and I highly doubt they are of the calibre of LLVM haha
455.
by MattRix 3y ago
Ok but this is extremely new tech, all of that stuff will get better over time, and the AI will require less and less intervention.
456.
by MattRix 3y ago
I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume “click bait” was also meant to be a fishing pun.
457.
by MattRix 3y ago
Ok but this is from the guy that created LLVM, Clang, and Swift… This is the real deal, he has no reason to exaggerate or lie.
458.
by MattRix 3y ago
Isn’t that kind of the whole thing? It already has the whole python ecosystem available to it.
459.
by MattRix 3y ago
Most of what you’re calling syntax isn’t syntax, it’s just extra code that allows you to be specific/concrete about how certain types and code should operate. When it comes to types, once you’ve written the optimized type definition, y
460.
by MattRix 3y ago
Yeah but my point is that I don’t think games are actually getting worse at that. If you go back and look at most older AAA games they actually have much less richness of interaction (on average) than the games that are coming out these day
461.
by MattRix 3y ago
You would need to provide some evidence that games are actually increasing in “lifelessness”. I find little evidence in favour of that idea.
462.
by MattRix 3y ago
It’s ok to pay money for things that are useful to you! Often most free alternatives have drawbacks or downsides of their own. Sure, there’s a chance they will eventually get shut down, but that almost never happens without warning. And it’
463.
by MattRix 3y ago
I remember seeing a stufy fairly recent that discovered that they actually weren’t very effective, especially if you use the front burners. My intuition about it is that if you can smell the food, you’re probably also getting air pollution.
464.
by MattRix 3y ago
Have you considered that they knew it wasn’t technically correct and used it anyway because it was the clearest way to get the idea across?
465.
by MattRix 3y ago
It’s not the idea that’s unique, it’s the interface. It was the same thing with Wordle.
466.
by MattRix 3y ago
In what way did they remove cryptic crosswords?
467.
by MattRix 3y ago
Different people having different tastes is not odd at all!
468.
by MattRix 3y ago
It’s also worth noting that the 50+ future inhabitants of that building get no say in the discussion either.
469.
by MattRix 4y ago
Clearly it isn’t, since this is a good list.
470.
by MattRix 4y ago
That’s only on mac though
471.
by MattRix 4y ago
FM = Foundational Model. Titan is the model, Bedrock is the service.
472.
by MattRix 4y ago
You can join discord just to use Midjourney. It’s really mot that big of a deal.
473.
by MattRix 4y ago
I don’t think those results are actually any better than what can be achieved with much more simple prompts. This seems like an example of the “Ikea effect”, where when once you’ve put in effort to assemble something, you perceive it to hav
474.
by MattRix 4y ago
Even if the technology froze at GPT-4 and never advanced, it would still be enough to change the world in all kinds of ways. The fact that the tech is still advancing as well is huge. Also now you’re seeing tons of solo devs, startups, and
475.
by MattRix 4y ago
This has to have been generated by ChatGPT.
476.
by MattRix 4y ago
Looks like somebody is confusing communism with socialism.
477.
by MattRix 4y ago
I don't think you understand what I mean. There is a share button, and they generate a link for each clip... You can access it by clicking on the "#1234" button (which is not obvious that it's a button/link), but wh
478.
by MattRix 4y ago
Another note: the share view on the clips doesn't include any way to get the actual link to the file. I imagine most people want the actual link so they can have more control over how and where they share it.
479.
by MattRix 4y ago
well no, their argument is more like: "Everyone should keep advancing the art of cooking, but just make sure they have a fire extinguisher handy" and your response is "Don't use fire to cook because there's a chance
480.
by MattRix 4y ago
I had this too, but the checkbox was just really small. My assumption was that they made it small so that people had to actually pay attention and read the text? But maybe it's just a bug haha

More ›