Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
MattJ100
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
391.
▲
by
MattJ100
10y ago
In general package maintainers only take existing software projects, and apply some glue to make them fit into the Debian distribution (think: build framework, file system location policies, documentation policies, etc.) so that the whole o
392.
▲
by
MattJ100
10y ago
Similarly to how they staff support phone numbers, with teams of people trained in domain-specific knowledge (of the product, account management, etc.). Sometimes these teams are in-house, sometimes they are contracted to a third-party (i.e
393.
▲
by
MattJ100
10y ago
You're not wrong, but just want to note that Ubuntu has a number of options in the graphical settings interface to control updates, including automatic installation of (either security, or all) updates.
394.
▲
by
MattJ100
10y ago
This article[1] (1999!) has a pro-GM scientist seemingly arguing that Bacillus thuringiensis can be fatal to mammals, criticizing its use in organic farming. Is this just blatantly incorrect, based on outdated science (given that it was pub
395.
▲
by
MattJ100
10y ago
An oldie here. Some recent discussion I read on HN reminded me about it, and I'm curious how applicable people think this still is in 2016.
396.
▲
Good Software Takes Ten Years. Get Used to It. (2001)
(joelonsoftware.com)
15 points
by
MattJ100
10y ago
|
3 comments
397.
▲
by
MattJ100
11y ago
XEP-0136 was pretty complex, and didn't see that much adoption. XEP-0313 is a modern replacement, focusing on just the things that people actually need. It's implemented in many servers and clients already (see https://
398.
▲
by
MattJ100
11y ago
> my workflow and screen `real estate` were impacted in very distracting ways. I doubt that was unintentional.
399.
▲
by
MattJ100
11y ago
Having implemented MQTT on both client and server sides, I have no idea why people keep saying it's easy to implement. Not my post, but an overview of some of its issues: http://vasters.com/clemensv/2014/06&#x
400.
▲
by
MattJ100
11y ago
Your XMPP example is incorrect, what you pasted is a notification that the user you were chatting with closed the conversation. A user going offline would be: <presence from="juliet@capulet.com/balcony" type="una
401.
▲
by
MattJ100
11y ago
- https://github.com/otalk/stanza.io - https://github.com/xmpp-ftw/xmpp-ftw It's really a shame when people can't look past the surface, and just emit vague subjective rebukes like this.
402.
▲
by
MattJ100
11y ago
Relevant to some here (and really every internet user), Cameron started his election campaign with a pledge to "ban encryption" if he was re-elected: - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30778424 - ht
403.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
If you have tried Prosody and have any feedback on it, I'm all ears (or drop us an email at developers (at) prosody.im). I love to receive feedback (of any kind), as it's the only way we know what we're doing right and wrong!
404.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Scroll down on the page for some suggestions.
405.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
> Suckless gets a bad rep (probably because of their openness about their opinions of the projects of which they create alternatives) I didn't know that, but it doesn't surprise me. However I also love the software the projec
406.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Another fun ice fact is that hot water freezes faster than cold water: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/hot_water.html
407.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
If you look at the source of that page, you'll see: <link type="application/atom+xml" rel="alternate" href="/feeds/p/dcef3/gitchanges/basic"> which refers to an A
408.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
For what it's worth, they do allow credit roll-over now (up to some limit). Still, I'm annoyed at the DRM, I can't listen to what I want where I want, and there are alternative DRM-free alternatives, so I'm also seriousl
409.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Right. It is questionable why self-signed certificates trigger scary warnings in browsers when totally unencrypted connections do not. I think the whole UI aspect of web transport security needs re-thinking.
410.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Anecdotal I know, but interestingly I also received one last week. I've had the account since Spotify was in private beta and this has happened only once before that I recall.
411.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Two clearly unbiased and factual analyses there :) It would take quite some time to sit down and address all the points gathered on the PSYC page. That page has been around a long time, and used to be a lot more aggressive than it reads now
412.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0322.html (originating from the IoT community, where XMPP is commonly, and successfully, used on embedded devices like you describe). Just please don't mention ASN.1 again :)
413.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
I'm not an expert in this field, but as far as I know ZRTP trust is bootstrapped from the signalling channel (in this case your XMPP connection). So a MITM there could also MITM your voice/video. And again, your metadata and signa
414.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
OTR only protects the text content of your messages. It doesn't protect the metadata, or many of the other features XMPP provides from status to file transfers and voice/video calls.
415.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Funnily enough, that's exactly what they did do, back in 2008 :) Originally Android included an XMPP API that applications could use to connect to Google and other XMPP services. This got replaced by a Google Talk-specific API at the
416.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
Naive implementations of XMPP on mobile can indeed get quite power hungry, but it doesn't have to be that way. Thankfully I've seen quite a bit of interest lately from mobile clients who wish to improve on this - all the resources
417.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
A self-signed certificate is free, you don't need a CA-issued certificate just to use encryption. Most XMPP servers on the internet today are forgiving of certificates they don't trust - they will encrypt the connection and then u
418.
▲
by
MattJ100
12y ago
It's possible to achieve quite secure group chats in XMPP, as long as you have a server that you trust (emphasis on that last part). You're probably talking about OTR though, which is quite tricky for multi-party situations. This
419.
▲
Mandatory encryption on XMPP starts today
(blog.prosody.im)
191 points
by
MattJ100
12y ago
|
98 comments
420.
▲
by
MattJ100
13y ago
For the people that wrote Moonshine, it was the ability to use the same language across all platforms[1]. They already have a lot of Lua code on other platforms that was unable to run on the web (without using Flash, which also has a Lua VM
More ›