Marha01

9 ms·

151.
by Marha01 4mo ago
> The tech succeeds at the goal - humans are mostly not needed anymore other than for menial low-paid work. Economy slows, then almost completely stops. Economy slows or stops when AI robots are producing goods and services for much lowe
152.
by Marha01 4mo ago
LLMs fundamentally work by predicting the next word (token). But that should not be used to diminish their potential capabilities. It's like saying that human brains "just predict (or produce) the next electrical impulse". Fu
153.
by Marha01 5mo ago
I use similar workflow. Here is my refactoring and code quality prompt that I regularly run: Perform a thorough analysis of the <project_name> project (the code and the documentation). - Explore the project, go over all impo
154.
by Marha01 6mo ago
Yes, mostly without those things. I regularly use Claude Opus 4.6/4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.4/5.5. For diagnosing and planning, I always use the highest thinking setting, perhaps with the exception of GPT, where xHigh is prett
155.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> Maybe when I can have the same interaction as with my fellow humans, where I can describe the issue (which is not the problem) and they can go solve it and provide either a sound plan to make the issue disappear. I don't know what
156.
by Marha01 6mo ago
The distinction between personal and commercial cars is too small to allow effectivelly banning one while keeping the other. Any country that tries to do so will inevitably overshoot in one of the directions: either the ban will be too perm
157.
by Marha01 6mo ago
Our civilization does not depend on aviation very much, it's a specialized service. If all planes disappeared tomorrow, we will weather it pretty well. Cars are a completely different animal: they are ubiquitous and don't really h
158.
by Marha01 6mo ago
How about the fact that any country that tries to ban private ownership of cars would completely fall behind in all car-related technologies, infrastructure and services, which would very soon negatively affect all those commercial or logis
159.
by Marha01 6mo ago
I don't think it's possible to clearly separate personal vehicles from commercial ones. The technology is the same. Any regulation that tries to ban the one while allowing the other would be a huuuge clusterfuck.
160.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> "Other people's cars" facilitate thousands of aspects of modern living and society that you apparently take for granted. You can choose to ONLY look at the negative impacts, but the comment as stated is ridiculous. THIS!
161.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> Personal cars are not the same as using them for logistics. Yes, they are in fact, the same. You cannot introduce such massively useful technology into the world and then say that it would be used only for logistics and not for persona
162.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> The cost of stealing has always been essentially zero. That is not necessarily true, depending on the level of enforcement and the availability of opportunities to steal. > Same argument can be made for streaming, and yet Netflix is
163.
by Marha01 6mo ago
The best answer to those issues is still Basic Income.
164.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> Anyone distributing infringing material can be liable There is still the "mens rea" principle. If you distribute infringing material unknowingly, it would very likely not result in any penalties.
165.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> So is music free now? Uhm... yes? The cost of downloading pirated music is essentially zero. The only reason why people use services like Spotify is because it's extremely cheap while being a bit more convenient. But jack up the p
166.
by Marha01 6mo ago
Funny, their army of lawyers seems incapable of stopping me from easily downloading pirated software or coding an open alternative to their closed-source software with AI if I wanted to.. You cannot keep a purely legally-enforced moat in th
167.
by Marha01 6mo ago
> If the cli can access the secrets, the agent can just reverse it and get the secret itself. What do you mean by this? How "reverse it"? The CLI tool can access the secure storage, but that does not mean there is any CLI inter
168.
by Marha01 7mo ago
> Seems like a big issue is I'm guessing insistence on having this be a solo operation for cultural reasons. Hmm... perhaps train a robot arm to do it?
169.
by Marha01 7mo ago
Demand for top models is definitely not saturated, at least when it comes to programming. If I could afford to use 5x more Claude Opus 4.6 tokens, I would!
170.
by Marha01 7mo ago
Yes, but they use various "harnesses" to do so (dog guides, text to speech software, assistance of other humans when needed..). Why can't AI?
171.
by Marha01 7mo ago
People blind from birth literally lack the neural circuits to comprehend visual data. Are they not intelligent?
172.
by Marha01 7mo ago
Don't you see the massive problem with requiring visual input? Are blind people not intelligent because they cannot solve ARC-AGI-3 without a "harness"? A theoretical text-only superintelligent LLM could prove the Riemann hyp
173.
by Marha01 7mo ago
Does this mean blind people are not intelligent?
174.
by Marha01 7mo ago
Well said. That's exactly what has been rubbing me the wrong way with all those "LLMs can never *really* think, ya know" people. Once we pass some level of AI capability (which we perhaps already did?), it essentially turns i
175.
by Marha01 7mo ago
From your source: > Ultra-processed foods: Ultra-processed foods typically have more than 1 ingredient that you never or rarely find in a kitchen. They also tend to include many additives and ingredients that are not typically used in ho
176.
by Marha01 8mo ago
It is magical thinking to claim that LLMs are definitely physically incapable of thinking. You don't know that. No one knows that, since such large neural networks are opaque blackboxes that resist interpretation and we don't real
177.
A practical guide to hill climbing(cline.bot)
1 points by Marha01 8mo ago|0 comments
178.
Gemini app rolling out music generation for all with Lyria 3(9to5google.com)
1 points by Marha01 8mo ago|0 comments
179.
by Marha01 8mo ago
I don't find it interesting in an artistic way, but I do find it very interesting from an "AI experiment" angle.
180.
by Marha01 8mo ago
Very interesting experiment! I tried something related half a year ago (LLMs writing midi files, musical notation or guitar tabs), but directly creating audio with Python and sine waves is a pretty original approach.

More ›