MadxX79

5 ms·

31.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
I love the total lack of humility on that site. "What if the METR study turns out not to capture anything relevant? We just add a constant gap to be conservative!". But I guess these guys aren't really scientist, so it&#x27
32.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
It really dispelled the illusion for me, but it's not that easy to find those examples, but the combinatorics of possible number of guesses is untractable enough that it can't learn a good set of clues for all possible guesses.
33.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
Isn't it just that he left way before gpt-5, then? At that point a sufficiently naive person could have believed that scaling was going to lead to AGI, but that sort of optimism died after he was already an outsider.
34.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
I'm guessing they have a lot of shares in the AI companies they work(ed) for, and they would like to pump their value so they can buy an even nicer carribean island than they can already afford?
35.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
I enjoyed playing mastermind with LLMs where they pick the code and I have to guess it. It's not aware that it doesn't know what the code is (it isn't in the context because it's supposed to be secret), but it just keeps
36.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
The guy founded two AI companies and exited one, is a researcher who is an expert on how actual human babies learns things and who has done research comparing how LLMs learn and represent language compared to humans. How much more expertise
37.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
I rushed so much that I didn't have time to do it right. It could have been the AST tree of my PIN number validation algorithm for ATM machines. :-P
38.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
Can it store my PIN numbers and my map of ATM machines also?
39.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
What's your argument here? He's not allowed to discuss crony capitalism because you imagine that he thinks LLMs suddenly became reliable.
40.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
Brook's law anno 2026: "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later -- unless that manpower is AI, then you're golden!"
41.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
From your link: "We excluded reasoning models from our analysis of per-token prices. Reasoning models tend to generate a much larger number of tokens than other models, making these models cost more in total to evaluate on a benchmark.
42.
by MadxX79 7mo ago
source?
43.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
Is that the cost per token or the actual cost of the user having a conversation, reasoning and all?
44.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
If you don't give me a discount on my salesforce subscription I'll shoot myself in the face with this AI enabled gun?
45.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
Absolutely, the belief in scientific circles is that the way forward to develop cures (or at least treatment that slows down the progression) is to treat it early. When you get to the point where you start showing clear symptoms, your brain
46.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
There's really two cases here. You live in a democracy? YES) the violation you describe is verifiable to a journalist. You publish story, and you keep the government accountable. NO) Why are you even discussing if age verification is a
47.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
If I worked in a European intelligence agency, and considering how the the official US security policy revolves around bringing about regime change in Europe in support of far right extremist parties, and how supportive the tech company lea
48.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
What I really want is to be able to search through the training dataset to see the n closest hits (cosine distance or something). I think the illusion would very quickly be dispelled that way.
49.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
Yeah, the interpolation works if there are enough close examples around it. Problem is that the dimensionality of the space you are trying to interpolate in is so incomprehensibly big that even training on all of the internet, you are alway
50.
by MadxX79 8mo ago
I don't understand peoples problem with this! Now everyone is going to discuss this on the internet, it will be scraped by the AI company web crawlers, and the replies goes into training the next model... and it will never make this _p
51.
by MadxX79 1y ago
Isn't a mathematician arguing that Galileo was a bad scientist because he wasn't as good at deriving the area under some function as Archimedes, a bit like a fish arguing that Galileo was a bad scientist because he couldn't s