MWil

18 ms·

151.
by MWil 13y ago
thanks
152.
by MWil 13y ago
I associate Draft with Nathan Kontny's wonderful stuff https://draftin.com/about (edit) I see it's been renamed! Should have gone past the banner image!
153.
by MWil 13y ago
This has to be the smoothest scrolling image transition on that scale I've seen. Anybody care to enlighten an amateur how they did it?
154.
by MWil 13y ago
In December 2012, I did something utterly stupid. I found a leaked email list of all attendees of the World Conference on International Telecommunications and gave them my uncensored thoughts on the dangers of a closed and censored interne
155.
by MWil 13y ago
Her twitter posts at the bottom take the Newsweek reporter's credibility even lower if you ask me. A lot of people would have loved to talk with you pre-story, lady!
156.
by MWil 13y ago
edit: this was an administrative law judge's decision from the national transportation safety board aka not set in stone
157.
by MWil 13y ago
Without a law that gets passed otherwise, this also opens up the floodgates to full law enforcement use of drones in public/private airspace. If the sky's open for for commercial use, it's automatically available for law enf
158.
by MWil 13y ago
it does say any block chain can be used
159.
by MWil 13y ago
I asked about and then proposed what you call a data fuzzer about 3 years ago. Instead of not using Facebook, get your computer to use it when you're not and muddy the data collected on you. Friends would know the relevant period to ig
160.
by MWil 13y ago
I'm sorry but that article neglects any mention of court opinions (many of which I have read, as has any law student) which interpret the law and say otherwise.
161.
by MWil 13y ago
If Google only needs to visit Wikipedia's "scraper" page once a day or less, but serves it out to others with attribution, isn't that helping Wikipedia by lowering traffic COSTS?
162.
by MWil 13y ago
I have requested access to upload. I want to help get a ~100GB collection of caselaw/legislation out there for research/hackathon purposes. I grabbed it all from a HN post about a month or so ago. He's since put it behind a
163.
by MWil 13y ago
it may be lost to spend but can't you spread the loss out over some years and never pay taxes for that period?
164.
by MWil 13y ago
Even some of the greatest minds just lose "it", whatever "it" is that they had. First off, he absolutely deserves some credit just for having the tough conversations that have taken far too long to enter the mainstream.
165.
by MWil 13y ago
Without ever having heard of Schneier before the Snowden leaks, I just don't see the basis for the respect he receives. I wrote here somewhere yesterday that his efforts in air-gapping his workstation used to examine the Snowden files
166.
by MWil 13y ago
so close to another dick joke
167.
by MWil 13y ago
It's worth 0% assurance that you are still in Japan, Mark. Just sayin.
168.
by MWil 13y ago
ah, now that sounds like a much better situation. glad to hear it.
169.
by MWil 13y ago
But this plan wasn't organized by workers, it was done by one blogger. He may be donating this strategy to any collection of workers willing to make use of it but he paid the lawyers and they only shared it with him.
170.
by MWil 13y ago
If it's true, I don't understand why it took one guy hiring a lawyer on his own who did the detective work necessary to help out the rest of the industry. You know, instead of like the concerted efforts of the industry itself. Do
171.
by MWil 13y ago
I don't but I also don't see why that's "famously" if it's from 2006. I did a grad school paper on automation/relocation/innovation regarding union busting and this stuff has been predicted since the
172.
by MWil 13y ago
The videos on your site don't load for me. I've turned off ad blocks...
173.
by MWil 13y ago
nonpaywall?
174.
by MWil 13y ago
"He's a Windows guy" simply does not sit well with me in that scenario. What does it say that he can't be either inconvenienced or convinced by Greenwald or convinced by the very documents he's examining or recogni
175.
by MWil 13y ago
3Mth
176.
by MWil 13y ago
if they hadn't done it so piecemeal it wouldn't be so interesting. Quick get it out of the headline! You idiot, it's still in the url! You fool, it's right in the first sentence! Damnit, the first letter of every line sp
177.
by MWil 13y ago
Or someone clued them in to the same thing I mentioned, that they didn't really NEED that headline. It still read very well without it.
178.
by MWil 13y ago
It was in fact changed.
179.
by MWil 13y ago
I think that's true. The headline could be changed and the text would still be read assurably.
180.
by MWil 13y ago
"never directly connect it to the Internet again" but not, "never directly connect it to the Internet"? Seems odd to me since you can use the same air-gap to configure the computer for your needs in the first place inste

More ›