M95D

5 ms·

61.
by M95D 2mo ago
I think it was the "security" argument. Some magic words like "security" and "protect the children" make most people go insane, abandon all reason.
62.
by M95D 2mo ago
Lawsuit against a tirant? Who would dare?
63.
by M95D 2mo ago
But look at the rate of it. How many new exciting things between 1950 and 1960? Color TV, jet airplanes, transistors, computers, early programming languages, nuclear power, artificial satellites, polio vaccine, credit cards, microwave oven,
64.
by M95D 2mo ago
How do you know? Seriously. Manufacturers could add modems to bypass the need for a wifi or cable connection, like they do in cars. I would expect by now that's a valid question to ask if I were to buy a new TV.
65.
by M95D 2mo ago
The city could pay a full-time auditor to just follow this cop around and count his hours of work and they would still pay less money in total.
66.
by M95D 2mo ago
> But there is one variable, Nuclear War. I expect that will happen as the climate gets worse and worse. That war could drop us into a cold streak. Not possible anymore (if it ever was possible - even that is debated). Nuclear winter pre
67.
by M95D 2mo ago
> Police are not interested, saying no one can prove who was driving. How about asking the owner?
68.
by M95D 2mo ago
Why? They could simply study "ovarian cancer in mice". Was it a protest?
69.
by M95D 2mo ago
They should not canditate. Let a comedian do it instead, like UK did with Count Binface.
70.
by M95D 2mo ago
Do you really trust that last part?
71.
by M95D 2mo ago
What's the biggest restaurant in UK? How many people can have lunch with Adele at the same time?
72.
by M95D 2mo ago
But LDL-cholesterol is already better than both at predicting heart disease. Why waste money on this "research"?
73.
by M95D 2mo ago
In what way? Western world quality of life and standards of living? Or sustainability? You can't have both.
74.
by M95D 2mo ago
Airplane tugs (electric) driven by airport personnel + ground navigation aids would decrease those too, and airplanes won't need to burn fuel waiting in line for takeoff at busy airports.
75.
by M95D 2mo ago
Take off weight is calculated anyway. Airport crew could do it based on calculated weight comunicated by pilots. With current technology it could even be automated - pull the airplane 10 m at a fixed (low) power setting, determine how fast
76.
by M95D 2mo ago
At a comfortable 1G acceleration it would reach 500 Km/h in less than 1000 m or 750 Km/h in 2000 m.
77.
by M95D 2mo ago
> There's a TON of complexity in a catapult system. But it's all on the ground.
78.
by M95D 2mo ago
Years in US. Not years in China, Russia, elsewhere.
79.
by M95D 2mo ago
AFAICT americans are left on their own in the face of any kind of disaster. But, to be fair, in Europe we don't (yet) have the kinds of disasters that they have, so I can't say if europeans are left on their own or not.
80.
by M95D 2mo ago
Air transport in general, not just this airplane, could benefit from a catapult or winch takeoff at airports. It could be electric, it would reduce the most energy-demanding part of flight and make takeoff safer. They could also use electri
81.
by M95D 2mo ago
And then Agent Smith realized that multiplying is good...
82.
by M95D 2mo ago
Arguably? Capitalism will crash and burn before it will solve any env problem. May I remind you that without NASA (not a private entity) and without gov regulations (not industry self-regulation) we wouldn't have an ozone layer today.
83.
by M95D 2mo ago
That was sustainable as long as they killed each other at the same rate as they reproduced, so they didn't fill all the available area. Civilized societies and medicine destroyed any chance of sustainability until contraception was inv
84.
by M95D 2mo ago
Start a viral trend and they'll be gone too in 5 years.
85.
by M95D 2mo ago
I used a MS-DOS analyzer until 4 years ago. The Win7 version of it [1] is worse in every way. [1] https://www.stago-us.com/products-services/hemostasis-system...
86.
by M95D 2mo ago
Mount Rainier DVD-RW! but here are so few of them...
87.
by M95D 2mo ago
No need. Thunderbolt is usually susceptible to DMA attacks.
88.
by M95D 2mo ago
It's the compiler too. I recently found out that kernel 6.6 can't be compiled by gcc 15. So, even if you have the source, unless it's extremely simple, at some point the current toolchain will refuse to build it.
89.
by M95D 2mo ago
> a stable ABI is only needed when you don't have the source > A stable ABI is only needed when you don't have the source or you don't know enough C to fix incompatibilities with every new version. There, I fixed it for
90.
by M95D 2mo ago
Just like a current Office does?

More ›