Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
M95D
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
391.
▲
by
M95D
7mo ago
Continue your argument. Don't stop at solar. In the next 5 billion years we must leave. How do you propose we do that if we focus on fast fashion and changing cars every 2 years?
392.
▲
by
M95D
7mo ago
Most consumption is arbitrary.
393.
▲
by
M95D
7mo ago
Reminds me of "fake parity" SIMM sticks.
394.
▲
by
M95D
7mo ago
Earth is limited. Resources are limited. You can't recycle to infinity. Each time you recycle something, the material recovered is worse than before. Steel is weaker, plastic has impurities and is not clear/transparent, paper isn&
395.
▲
by
M95D
7mo ago
I appreciate your detailed reply. I think we are looking from different perspectives. You are correct in an item-by-item way, but you need to put them all together and see the bigger picture. In my comment, it may have made a mess confusing
396.
▲
by
M95D
7mo ago
Until UEFI and secure boot, SMM would run code provided by the BIOS. BIOS was updatable, moddable, replaceable. See coreboot and numerous BIOS mods such as wifi whitelist removal. Trustzone usually runs code from eMMC. These chips are progr
397.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Oh, I didn't know that! There goes freedom in the ARM world too.
398.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Then you can load them in u-boot and there's no need for any ohter blob.
399.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFI#Criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACPI#Criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Management_Mode#Problem...
400.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
You can write to CR0 from a DOS COM program while in V86 mode??? :o Wouldn't that cause a GPF / segfault / EMM386 crash?
401.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
We'll find out decades later. Or never. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
402.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
True. But I'm voting with my wallet supporting those manufacturers that upstream to mainline kernel and don't require any signed firmware to boot.
403.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Let's say some hw manufacturer would open-source the required specs to implement it on it's chips. (Very unlikely, but let's say they do...) So what? Dangerous capabilites remain.
404.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
> there are so many phones with devicetree... and proprietary blobs controlling boot and running beneath ring 0 It's not the same! A bootloader, once it loads the kernel and executes it, is overwritten in memory. No trace of it rema
405.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
You can convert a DTB blob back into source code: dtc -I dtb -O dts -o devicetree.dts blob.dtb Big, biiig, biiiiig difference! PS: You can also examine it directly as a directory tree in /sys/firmware/devicetree/*
406.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
It's either a DTB per device or a firmware blob per device . I'll take the open source device tree anytime!
407.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
UEFI switches the CPU into 32bit v86 mode or directly in 64bit mode and you can't go back to real mode without a CPU reset, which v86 won't allow (you don't have ring -2 privileges) and 64bit mode can't do at all. I don&
408.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
You actually confirmed what I said. :)
409.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
I don't know what you're talking about. If the device boots, you find the device tree in /sys/firmware/fdt, or in unpacked human-readable form in /sys/firmware/devicetree/* .
410.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Will you PLEASE stop promoting UEFI and ACPI?! These are closed-source blobs that the manufacturers will never update and have complete control over the system at ring -2. Why would you even consider it? Device tree does the same thing an
411.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
^ that! You can't run a COM program today. Not without emulation. Recent PCs can't even run DOS EXE because they're missing the BIOS interrupts most DOS programs use.
412.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
> my worry is that ARM devices will bring an end to such an open platform like modern PCs are. Modern PCs are NOT open platform anymore. Not since signed bootloaders, UEFI, secure boot. ARM on the other hand, as long as they don't r
413.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
x86 always had standards: same two IRQ controllers, same UART chips, same keyboard controller, same PC speaker I/O, same ISA, same PCI, same AGP, VGA ROM that init the GPU with the same framebuffer address, all PATA controllers used th
414.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
I can't say anything about the German gov. I don't live there and I have no info. But I wouldn't call bureaucrats "capitalists" either.
415.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Shouldn't you manage permissions from groups instead of hacking udev? And why do you have modemmanager if you don't have a modem?
416.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
> Capitalism will actually save the day, because a bunch of capitalists advanced renewable technology to the point where it was cheap. That "bunch of capitalists"... why are you avoiding the true word: "China"?
417.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Probably because nobody targeted them yet.
418.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
None of it matters. If the device has a SIM card (virtual or physical), it will execute commands sent over the network. It's required by the GSM/LTE standards. The best you can hope for is to have separate SoC for the OS and separ
419.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
Modern dumb phones are just smartphones with a dumb UI.
420.
▲
by
M95D
8mo ago
My bank officially forbids access from a mobile browser (but it still works by selecting "Desktop site" in Firefox).
More ›