Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
M2Ys4U
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
57 ms
·
691.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
So you can test the code that your users actually run
692.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>True plant-based food should have a health benefit at least, especially over meat. Why?
693.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>If VideoLAN were a startup, it'd be a unicorn. If it were a startup it would have been run in to the ground by VCs in the name of growth-or-die.
694.
▲
Nominet faces showdown with British net industry: EGM called to oust CEO, board
(forums.theregister.com)
1 points
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
|
0 comments
695.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
I imagine that HTTP/2 use will almost entirely move to HTTP/3, and HTTP/1.1 usage will decline but there'll still be plenty of it around.
696.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
"Unlike other vaccines being trialled, the Oxford team had been taking weekly swabs from all volunteers to check whether they were infected but showing no symptoms." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55308216
697.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
AIUI Robinhood has halted buying shares and options, but they haven't halted selling . If it was purely a halt on all trading I could see the logic, but only preventing people from buying seems fishy to me. (I'm not involved on
698.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>do you think Boeing would be able to survive as an organisation if another one crashes? The US government will not let Boeing die, even if it should.
699.
▲
Delivering BBC Online Using Serverless
(medium.com)
1 points
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
|
1 comments
700.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
I don't see why not. British Airways only had a 38% market share when they were sued for abusing their dominant market position in 1998 (which was upheld by the Court of Justice in 2007)
701.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
> Don't you need permission to advertise your product with Coca Cola™? Not if what you're selling is Coca Cola
702.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
That depends on jurisdiction. In the EU, it is "dominant market position" (and explicitly so) that's the threshold for the Commission to take competition action, for instance.
703.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
More than 90% of households in the UK watch/listen/read at last 1 things on the BBC every week. A lot of people say "Oh I don't consume anything the BBC makes", and often they just don't realise that they do.
704.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>- Taskmaster: Channel 4 (originally Dave. In fact before that it was a Edinburgh Fringe Festival show written by "little" Alex Horne) Dave is owned by BBC Studios, which is the commercial arm that is a wholly-owned subsidiary
705.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>If the current government want to kill it completely why have the ruled out decriminalising non-payment of the licence fee? They haven't, yet. >There are pretty strong ethical reasons for why you shouldn't get a criminal re
706.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>I find the wording here fascinating. Is watching a live stream over the YouTube app on my TV 'live TV'? Is watching a UFC event on the UFC app? What about the website? If it's broadcast simultaneously by other means (e.g.
707.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
That show isn't even a BBC production, it's from Channel 5
708.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
I expect that will be slowly expanded; the BBC's new Director-General wants to increase commercial revenue (and immediately before being appointed as DG he was the CEO of BBC Studios, the BBC's commercial subsidiary).
709.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>Having grown up in an area with an abundance of crime I prefer to live with the surveillance of public spaces. Why? There is no correlation between the amount of surveillance and levels of crime (or even in the trend of levels of crim
710.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
That 33% is a plurality, though.
711.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
Browsers are now separating out caches per origin so that benefit has gone away.
712.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>I will never host anything on AWS since I know I could get removed at any time because of political reasons. >If you think Parler did something wrong, which I don't think they did Political reasons?! They didn't do anything
713.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
My opinion of Amazon went up ever so slightly by removing Parler. It should have done it a while ago (violent rhetoric didn't just pop up on there last week), but better late than never.
714.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
>Why would anyone design a system that way Because they knew that, being a save haven for violent white supremacists, it was likely one or more of their service providers would terminate service and wanted to continue to operate despite
715.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
Ofcom explicitly can't take pre-emptive action around content issues - the offending content must be actually broadcast before they can do anything. They can decide that a person is not "fit and proper" to hold a broadcast
716.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
Well, the love of money is the root of all of evil...
717.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
Framasoft - the organisation behind PeerTube - is French
718.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
I think the precedent of "if you incite violence you're no longer welcome" is a perfectly fine precedent to set.
719.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
I tend to avoid larger pubs because the quality of experience in smaller ones tends to be better. Quantity has a quality of its own, and it's not always a good thing.
720.
▲
by
M2Ys4U
6y ago
I'd take the claim that Gab was "the biggest Mastodon instance" with a pinch of salt, to be honest. Plus, they were immediately and almost universally banned by other instances in the fediverse
More ›