LunicLynx

5 ms·

31.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
Fair. AI might also not be the problem, but how it is utilized. Suddenly everyone and their grandma are specialist at everything and the actual value of understanding is not appreciated anymore.
32.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
This is not true. Because the copy is a devaluation of the original, so even though the web page is still there it’s value has decreased.
33.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
Wasn’t his point about plagiarism? That is also not ok on a small scale.
34.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
If they only would use lidar. Oh wait…
35.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
Any one surprised by this? This was very apparent around the iPhone 4 / 5 era. And the last ones hit were the 11 and 12 series.
36.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
If you are on windows it’s probably your virus scanner eating your IO and CPU
37.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
I’m sorry but I don’t understand why this is a story on hacker news. Nothing about this is interesting. I’m open to understand why I might be wrong though. I think marketwatch or financial times from the title…
38.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
Either this or we humans are out of the picture soon.
39.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
Markdown is not necessarily about presentation. It’s about structure that carries information. Surely a html page could do the same but I would see that as the last step, to give to someone else.
40.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
I think it can be summarized: Don’t push a map on an explorer, they wanted to explorer, a map is not what they are looking for. It’s a great article, thanks!
41.
by LunicLynx 5mo ago
You are absolutely right, having copilot does not help at all here.
42.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
I guess that’s the point, FSD is not available. What you buy is lvl 4/5 available is lvl 2+. I think, this is a calculation to understand if an upgrade of hw3 to hw4 actually solves the problem or if hw3 must be updated to hw5. One upg
43.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
Fair enough
44.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
But also tools that might not be nice and report security vulnerabilities, but exploit them. There is no guarantee that open means that they will be discovered.
45.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
Came here to say the same. Same tools + private. In security two different defense-mechanisms are always better than one.
46.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
Simple S3 sooooooo S4 ? xD
47.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
And with robots, this also applies to the physical world.
48.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
UX want to put their own spin on things. I’ve noticed this repeatedly. UX has gotten from something with a cause to being the cause for something
49.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
Just guessing here: Putting something at index 0 that has nothing to do with the content. I tend to agree, but I also didn’t try it. I also think the 7% number is wrong. 0.5% seems more realistic. It’s just that you are not able to see the
50.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
My knowledge on functional languages is limited, but as I understand it, it’s possible to formulate expressions that are basically NP problems? And hence impossible to speed up? So is it a F# issue or inherent to functional programming?
51.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
An unbeatable argument, really. But still there is a difference between learning and mastering. I recently helped my partner learn for her CS class, and I feel very comfortable arguing that my previous statement holds up. Mastering? No, in
52.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
If it’s not for you I guess that is ok. But from your comment I would also deduct that you never professionally used it. After so many different languages it’s the only one I always comeback to. The only things that I wish for are: rusts b
53.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
You are looking at it from what you know about C#, the goal is how can you reduce (delete) all this to make the language more accessible. For you it may be fine to write: List<string> strs = new List<string>(); And sure if you h
54.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
You aren’t giving enough credit to the careful evaluation of how this adaption is happening. So far everything that was added to C# very much reduces the amount of dead boilerplate code other languages struggle with. Really give it an hones
55.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
I guess it’s mainly to sell the technology and the illusion that comes with that. So, money, for supposed control. Which is not true of course
56.
by LunicLynx 6mo ago
This feels weird somehow. It feels like: Damn we can’t train our AI any better as everything regurgitated slop now. How can we get people to create new content for us, hopefully with new ideas … Might be just me though, but I definitely don
57.
by LunicLynx 7mo ago
Exactly my point, your country is only sending you to the Olympics if you are their absolute best. The competitive part does not start at the Olympics. The Olympics are already the price.
58.
by LunicLynx 7mo ago
You are aware that this is about athletes and not spectators, right? I agree when it comes to spectators, at least in some sports. But people do make a living, especially in poor countries, by being successful in sports.
59.
by LunicLynx 7mo ago
So which sport are you competing in, on an Olympic level? And who either man or woman did take a place from you, so that you weren’t able to take part or won’t be able to take part in the Olympics?
60.
by LunicLynx 7mo ago
So if I take your house. And you complain, I just say: „some people take ownership far too seriously!“ For some people sports is their life and livelihood for that matter, this should be acknowledged.

More ›