Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LtWorf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
211.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
You are assuming the democrats run on the elections for the purpose of winning them. But the latest election made me doubt that is actually their goal.
212.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Being denied medical care is murder as well.
213.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
> Perforce is free for 5 users too. ;) Free as in freedom…
214.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
So you haven't understood the distinction or you're letting your feelings for software get the best of you. The proof that there are no (for rust's definition of "no") memory bugs becomes worthless, not the entire s
215.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
You don't seem to understand what I'm talking about. bad axiom -> worthless theorem. bad unsafe section -> verified safe section is actually not safe.
216.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Rust doesn't check for logical errors, it checks for memory errors. So every single issue in an unsafe section is a potential CVE.
217.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Oh we should certainly trust the opinion of the science denier. Surely his opinions will be based on hard data and not on feelings!
218.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
An "unsafe" in rust is like an axiom in mathematics. You can use to prove higher level theorems but it has to make sense. The second that you start to introduce nonsensical axioms (or bugs in unsafe sections) all your proven corre
219.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
> Even when the laptop is asleep overnight it's practically melting. Then something is waking it up and it's not asleep at all. Asleep the CPU shouldn't be running.
220.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I don't think there being more rust developers should matter if we're talking about a company that solved coding.
221.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
For a company that solved coding and doesn't need any software engineers… why spend money to acquire a runtime rather than ask claude to rewrite it in assembly directly and be done with it? Could it be that they aren't being entir
222.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I don't think you can claim your code is secure, or can claim anything at all about your code, if you haven't written the code and have no idea what's in there. Rust protects against a rather small group of memory error, if a
223.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Maybe you should consider the objections by their merit rather than just being angry someone dares to criticise anthropic?
224.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
> new people will step up too Or they will not… how could you possibly know.
225.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Realistically the user has never used gnu/linux nor ever intends to do so.
226.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Can you name one free alternative that already exists and is better?
227.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Ok but how should the improved git replacement actually be? Feels to me you're just saying things.
228.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I don't think it's large files. It's basically made for .txt files and that is all. Even small binary files… you can have them but it's not great with those. I think it's fine for scope to exist.
229.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I was responding to someone who made a generic statement about git?
230.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
No no. I know SVN and mercurial as well. Git is better. And normally when someone pushes a huge file it means they compiled something on their machine and are placing it on git, which is something that raises all the alarm bells for me.
231.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I don't understand why downvote something 100% factual and correct. Please explain!
232.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
apt-get is kinda old, "apt" is the new thing. It unifies some commands like apt-get, apt-cache, and probably something else but those are the only 2 I use :D
233.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I'm pretty sure that also people who write novels aren't held back by how fast they can type.
234.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
I'm sure soon enough dating apps will get smart and instead of the "you have no matches" they will make some fake AI matches so you have a feeling that something is happening and you have a chance of actually meeting someone.
235.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
E pluribus anum
236.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
It's not about what people want, it's about what designers all sheepishly follow.
237.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
But maybe if you want to sell more you must have instructions that anyone can follow?
238.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
You're already vibe coding, how worse can it get?
239.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Make up your mind :D
240.
▲
by
LtWorf
3mo ago
Who needs fixing well known vulnerabilities anyway?
More ›