LolWolf

41 ms·

1. 481.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   Pretty much, but if you have some good knowledge of what the distributions of neighboring pixels must look like (e.g. the l1 norm error used here wouldn't be enough, I believe) then I think you'd be surprised at the outcome.
2. 482.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   This is super interesting; how does it compare to other sampling algorithms? While the problem is indeed reducible; it also has a lot more structure than TSP, especially if we note that natural images are forced to come from some nice, un
3. 483.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   I see, okay; I caught that point in the article through the first part, but the latter part got me stuck back on the same point hence the question. Thank you for the clarification.
4. 484.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   Wait, but I thought the question being posed wasn't about the computational complexity of any model but about the power of a given computational model relative to another (e.g. the subject of the CT thesis). Even if we're talking
5. 485.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   This is an interesting article, but I'm still fairly confused about the notion that is made >Harper’s attack on the utility of machine models and lack of modularity is tantamount to an architect saying to a chemist, “both of our dis
6. 486.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   20
7. 487.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   Very different. Their text focuses on the connections between stochastic systems, information theory, and machine learning/discrete models in mathematics, whereas the one you linked is purely about statistics and machine learning from
8. 488.▲
   by LolWolf 10y ago

   The usual reference is this[1] paper which outlines most well-known results on biconvexity and optimiality thereof. [1] http://www2.math.uni-wuppertal.de/~klamroth/publications/gop...
9. 489.▲
   Hutter Prize(en.wikipedia.org)

   2 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
10. 490.▲
    Canaima (operating system)(en.wikipedia.org)

    1 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
11. 491.▲
    Red Star OS(en.wikipedia.org)

    3 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
12. 492.▲
    by LolWolf 10y ago

    > I would be fine if someone came up with a theory of, say, electromagnetism based on assuming the existence of the flying spaghetti monster or, to stick to the topic, based on assuming that our reality is mostly constructed by culture.
13. 493.▲
    Elsevier – My part in its downfall (2012)(gowers.wordpress.com)

    111 points by LolWolf 10y ago|37 comments
14. 494.▲
    Discrete Differential Geometry for Image Processing [pdf](cs.cmu.edu)

    12 points by LolWolf 10y ago|1 comments
15. 495.▲
    The Happy ending problem(en.wikipedia.org)

    2 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
16. 496.▲
    Genetic Algebra(en.wikipedia.org)

    1 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
17. 497.▲
    Could a neuroscientist understand a microprocessor? [pdf](biorxiv.org)

    1 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
18. 498.▲
    by LolWolf 10y ago

    > While the above equation, dubbed the "superformula" by Gielis (2003), is clearly capable of describing a number of diverse biological shapes having a variety of symmetries, it seems unlikely that this formula has any particul
19. 499.▲
    by LolWolf 10y ago

    Interesting. I'm still wondering about why we should use analytical solutions for shapes rather than meshes? What all is the general advantage? It seems like now we have enough computational power to not have to worry about such analyt
20. 500.▲
    Deep neural network expressivity as a consequence of Riemann curvature and chaos(arxiv.org)

    1 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
21. 501.▲
    Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaos(arxiv.org)

    3 points by LolWolf 10y ago|0 comments
22. 502.▲
    by LolWolf 10y ago

    Yes: the joke.
23. 503.▲
    Maktub Locker – Beautiful and Dangerous [reverse-engineer by MalwareBytes Labs](blog.malwarebytes.org)

    2 points by LolWolf 11y ago|0 comments
24. 504.▲
    Intuitionism(en.wikipedia.org)

    1 points by LolWolf 13y ago|0 comments
25. 505.▲
    by LolWolf 13y ago

    Yep, same here! http://i.imgur.com/4uNBOoj.jpg
26. 506.▲
    by LolWolf 13y ago

    In general, very, very few things in nature follow a power law. And, either way, like is stated, it is fairly difficult (if not impossible) to even make sense of what is a power law---notably, in phenomenological cases, power laws have no
27. 507.▲
    by LolWolf 13y ago

    I can't be the only one who seriously doesn't even understand this article. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for gender-equality, but say what about languages like Spanish? Do those have to be gender-neutral, too? Should we
28. 508.▲
    Majority is not Enough: Bitcoin Mining is Vulnerable(arxiv.org)

    1 points by LolWolf 13y ago|0 comments
29. 509.▲
    by LolWolf 13y ago

    Wow, been looking for something like this for some time... thank you.
30. 510.▲
    by LolWolf 13y ago

    But what was leaked is really not all that much. Recall that 1Bq is a disintegration per second, and, although a few trillion is quite a bit, this is over a massive volume. Now, there's nothing stated in terms of how much leaked into w