LightG

16 ms·

91.
by LightG 4y ago
Karma. I was so disppointed (as a customer) at the trajectory at the time. It could have been so much more and I was willing it on.
92.
by LightG 4y ago
Octopussies, natch.
93.
by LightG 4y ago
"Yeah, there's a good buck in that racket"
94.
by LightG 4y ago
Shame. They sound exactly like the new boss.
95.
by LightG 4y ago
I'll take it as a stopgap until we figure out what is the next step. Musk can shove his $8 up his big, fat... fail whale.
96.
by LightG 4y ago
Interesting. Think this and a few other people are helping me make the decision to set up on Mastodon. The trend seems to be going that way.
97.
by LightG 4y ago
No, New Labour was 1994 when Blair took over the leadership, not just when he became PM. And before that was John Smith. Pro-European and further to the left than the more centrist Blair. Again, please be historically accurate. You're
98.
by LightG 4y ago
One thing's for sure. If I was a remaining employee, I'd be on the phone to my network for a new job. I've been in that situation. You get to do 20% of the job of 5-10 other people for the same pay because... suck it up.... o
99.
by LightG 4y ago
Elon centre-left? Nope, centre right at best. Or, if he is actually centre-left (neither of us will know), he has (for the last couple of years) been sucking up to the right. The effect is the same. I assumed he was playing each side off ag
100.
by LightG 4y ago
Isn't it basically Musk borrowing money in Twitter's name to finance part of the deal? Increases risk and exposure for the company, but not Musk personally.
101.
by LightG 4y ago
... via a swift kick from capitalism in the ghoolies ... "Fate loves irony"
102.
by LightG 4y ago
Yes, I'm sure they're just scanning for vulnerabilities ...
103.
by LightG 4y ago
My bad. Same question to them then!
104.
by LightG 4y ago
Good to hear. Thanks.
105.
by LightG 4y ago
Perhaps that's the point. It's not worth $44bn. Twitter rinsed Musk on the way out, which I deeply respect considering his behaviour. That will only be some salve for the employees losing their jobs, but hopefully their packages g
106.
by LightG 4y ago
>> Even Labour is tame compared to what it was 30 years ago. What? 30 years ago was the 1990's. The era of Blair and Brown. Try and be historically honest, please.
107.
by LightG 4y ago
I agree, discussing this is pointless as we've demonstrated. Ascribing defintions to yourself that you think I have, or might, call you, in anticipation, is where we're at. As someone else said. Our current ruling party (or a sect
108.
by LightG 4y ago
Absolutely. England has been captured by far-right think-tanks, dressed up in nice suits and dresses. There are pockets of resistence within the ruling party, but that doesn't change the last 10 years of madness. If you are unaware of
109.
by LightG 4y ago
Japan isn't the only other example of difference out there. Odd that you should have chosen such an extreme example.
110.
by LightG 4y ago
Example 68: a Company T-Shirt.
111.
by LightG 4y ago
* stifled laughter * Genuinely sorry.
112.
by LightG 4y ago
Care to elaborate on 'since I don't have a smart phone'? That was probably the most interesting part of the whole comment!
113.
by LightG 4y ago
Except ... they do. Often.
114.
by LightG 4y ago
Or ... "max waste" ... no harm being honest about it and keeing peoples eyes on the prize!
115.
by LightG 4y ago
Don't worry. You can escalate it to the Supreme Court.
116.
by LightG 4y ago
Are you telling me there are no housing affordability problems in the US? Fascinating.
117.
by LightG 4y ago
Thanks. That's an interesting (if tragic) clarification.
118.
by LightG 4y ago
Murica!!!
119.
by LightG 4y ago
So FSD is dead for now. Many of us have been banging on that it's at least a decade away, if that. Given this realisation, why are Tesla still selling this snake oil?
120.
Was Jack Dorsey the most unproductive major CEO of the last two decades?
5 points by LightG 4y ago|2 comments

More ›