LethargicStud

6 ms·

31.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
Do you mind sharing the math? Isn't impossible to know how much the equity is cut by because we don't know how much dilution there was (vs. liquidation)?
32.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
I'm actually in support of this. It's very important to separate content providers from entities that make things more discoverable. Google's job is to help me find what I'm looking for, not to decide what I can or canno
33.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
Great article, I learned a lot. I've wondered for a while why some usernames appear green, it would be nice to include that too.
34.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
They weren't, they were losing a lot.
35.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
But that won't scale because the public won't have time to study every case that occurs. Maybe instead we could have specific people whose job it is to analyze cases and make judgements. And maybe each case could be assigned a few
36.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
I _really_ hope they let braintree handle that and don't touch PANs. If they do store PANs, presumably they'd be audited and hopefully would store them more securely. But hey, I guess you never know and less exposure is always bet
37.
by LethargicStud 9y ago
Sure, but Google or AWS looking at your specific certs and using them to decrypt your traffic or impersonate you is probably far less likely than someone MITMing Cloudflare's connection to your server or even worse finding a vulnerabil
38.
by LethargicStud 10y ago
Thanks for the link, but the closing '>' should not be part of it.
39.
Buildserverless: Free Serverless Node.js Builds on Google Cloud Functions(medium.com)
1 points by LethargicStud 10y ago|0 comments
40.
by LethargicStud 10y ago
One thing I don't quite understand is omitting protocol. If you don't know the protocol, fine it makes sense to omit it. However if you know a resource can always be loaded via HTTPS (eg from CDN), isn't it safer to force HTT