Lerc

8 ms·

121.
by Lerc 3mo ago
Nah, it must have already happened, I saw a video on YouTube that said it was imminent a year ago.
122.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I have done this on a number of platforms over the years. Going back to before createDIBSection existed (In fact I had something break when Windows provided an easy path and took away the method I had been using). Linux has always been a we
123.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I think their own community can make their own rules. My only thought in doing so the description of what they represent would then be subject to those rules. They state "The mission of Codeberg e.V. is to build and maintain a free c
124.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I'm not sure how this interacts with open source principles. I think they are free to do whatever they want with their own website and indeed with open source tooling, but as a host for open source it could conceivably conflict wit
125.
by Lerc 3mo ago
For strict definitiond of necessary (see also sufficient) this is correct. A is not necessary for B if a single instance of B exists without A. In colloquial terms it is frequently used to suggest a recommendation with an imperitive need. D
126.
by Lerc 3mo ago
The entire thesis of my commrnt is copyright is not that. It awards a few creators outsize rewards, but suppress creation of many more. It does not petform the job that it is supposed to do.
127.
by Lerc 3mo ago
Indeed, perhaps I should have said There needs to be a way to support the creation of art.
128.
by Lerc 3mo ago
How many times were hugely popular books rejected before a publisher decided they were worthy? Copyright far more protects the wealthy than the good. They don't need to sell your book, they just need to own the book that people are bu
129.
by Lerc 3mo ago
> why operators should have access to models that don't try to question their Daves. I am unsure if this is terminology I am unfamiliar with, a typo of Devs, or a 2001 reference.
130.
by Lerc 3mo ago
The best ad placement for a consumer is one for the best product of the sort they want. Taking money to decide which of the options to show is in conflict with the goal of showing the most appropriate.
131.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I am generally against the idea. I have seen it argued that advertising can provide access for those who could not otherwise afford it. I am not convinced, I would like all AI be required to state who they are acting in service of (with t
132.
by Lerc 3mo ago
Have a go at writing something in 1975's C. x=-5 Is not x = -5 There's no unsigned int. It's a better comparison to the usability of Claude than you might think. It's doable, but hardly ideal.
133.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I guess we can come back in 20 years and see if Claude is as reliable as LLVM is today. That would give a comparison between similar aged products.
134.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I attempted that. In videos from the last year the only things I could find were some people protesting ICE, A person accusing a mayor of sexual assault, some republican party events with protestors, and a few of people speaking out of tu
135.
by Lerc 3mo ago
>language models are trained to maximise engagement I have seen no research to that effect. >and maximally convey meaning Nobody knows how to measure that They are trained to complete sequences, then they are trained to engage in conv
136.
by Lerc 3mo ago
It's an odd thing, because the reason the word content is used is to permit diversity, but it seems to be widely rejected by those who claim to value diversity. It's a good man who can bring home the sculpture that his wife likes
137.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I think the distinction is that when an AI generates the phrase it chooses to use the negation and then fills in the terms. If it only has one thing to communicate at that point then it is essentially placing a redundant rephrasing on onr s
138.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I wrote that comment entirely by myself, on my phone while waiting for a souvlaki. Perhaps the things that you consider AI tells are simply a use of language from someone in country with a different education system. I can't really ju
139.
by Lerc 3mo ago
>Not everything that can be done should be done. My concern is that people are being cavalier about the possibility of creating things that should have rights. There will always be people who will never accept that a machine has awarenes
140.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I don't think it was a misunderstanding, the comment was not addressing the content of your post, but rather the descision to bring it up in a context where they thought it not relevant.
141.
by Lerc 3mo ago
The guillotine requires being in control of the situation. It can only be used by those with the power to act with impunity. It's not fighting against tyrants, it's a declaration of an intention to be the next tyrants.
142.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I tend towards being cautious with my information which has led to beauricracies doubting my existence. I got my first passport at a formative period of my life (international travel does that). I looked nothing like the photo within aa ye
143.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I think the fundamental problem is that art is not economical. Banksy once made a comment about the advertising industry, more or less to the effect that for all the corrupting influence of Advertising, the thing he truly hates about it is
144.
by Lerc 3mo ago
Do you have links to these videos? You comment suggests you feel there is something wrong with what I said, could you elaborate?
145.
by Lerc 3mo ago
> I really hate the idea that AI can replace artists, or humans as a whole. I think it’s anti-human to its core. AI can no more replace artists, than other artists can. A sunset can be nice to look at yet be created without meaning. Any
146.
by Lerc 3mo ago
We'll all go together when we go.
147.
by Lerc 3mo ago
> "Anti-AI psychosis" will probably grow to outcompete AI psychosis by year's end. Everyone has their own experiences making it hard to judge what attitudes are prevalent. From what I have encountered the Anti-AI people h
148.
by Lerc 3mo ago
I guess that means we are lucky that TVs weigh so much less now.
149.
by Lerc 3mo ago
Where is the previous version referred to in the codebase? I'm guessing that would be the place to look for changes. If you can't find an update at that place in the codebase saying 1.4.0 you can ask where it is. It seems after
150.
by Lerc 3mo ago
You seem to be wrong about that Nevertheless, the principles of open source never demanded more than providing the source upon request.

More ›