Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Lazare
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
60 ms
·
511.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Mmm, it's interesting. There's really two options here: Option A: Son is right, and the market is wrong. WeWork is a ~$50b company, and after a bit of hardball SoftBank will own 70% of it for a very affordable $15b (or whatever
512.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
You reckon they'd have banned him if he'd worn a Elizabeth Warren campaign badge? Really? Like...that's a thing you honestly can imagine?
513.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Highly debatable. It's by no means clear the rules should have been applied to this case; they were very vague "we can ban anyone for anything that makes us look bad", but what has made Blizzard look bad here has primarily be
514.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> [O]ver the past several days we received credible information [...] that the app was being used maliciously to [...] victimize individuals and property where no police are present. Okay, but even if true, I've got very credible ev
515.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
I fixed my wording relating to the Register article; it's getting a little confusing to try and track all the different comment threads, edits, and updates. As for the rest of your comment, that seems to contradict claims made by other
516.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
They are apologising for 1) not implementing the new CoC fast enough and 2) not being clear enough when they did, which led to people arguing about what happened, whether a CoC is even a good idea, whether or not people should be forced to
517.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
SO removed a Jewish mod during a Jewish holiday, when she would not be using the internet. She complained about it, and they apologised for the timing.
518.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> It would take them a few clicks to undo their mistake and reinstate the mod, no? I'm not convinced that removing Monica as a moderator was a mistake. She made it clear in a comment quoted by The Register that she refused to use t
519.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
A bit late, but a good response, I'd say.
520.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
There seems to be some debate about that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21175143 > Monica was asked many times, by many other moderators, to please use "singular they" for people who she actively knew pr
521.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
If I'm reading these leaks correctly, the core issue is that Monica was not okay with singular they. The issue isn't that SO was forcing her not to use it, it's that they were forcing her to use it, and she was refusing.
522.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Stack Overflow has handled the communication and PR side of this about as badly as a company can, and I started - and still want to be - on the side of the moderators. However, as near as I can tell from piecing together the different leaks
523.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> Device manufacturers might provide built-in XMPP addresses for devices (fridge124529@samsung.kr, bulb981232545@phillips.nl, etc), and they can interact with each other and with home automation hub over a reliable standard protocol. Yea
524.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
I fear that's more an indictment of available chat protocols, than it is a defence of XMPP. :)
525.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
XMPP, a solution looking for a problem for over 20 years. :(
526.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> XMPP supports federation, which means that devices from different manufacturers connected to different platforms can talk to each other with a standard communication protocol. The idea behind federation with XMPP for humans (aka, Jabbe
527.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Arg, good point. Unfortunately, it's too late to edit or delete the comment now. Shouldn't comment right before lunch; I get grumpy apparently. :(
528.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
In some markets, nothing happens until a buyer and a seller both want to transact at the same time at the same price. Real estate is like this; you can't sell your house to the market; you have to wait until a specific person wants to
529.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> Think about it this way, as a small-time investor, you won't always get the best price. As a small-time investor, you can trivially get a better price than larger investors. And you must, by law, get the National Best Bid and Off
530.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
If you have no idea what you're talking about, why even comment? They don't sell the data, they sell the orders , and the people that buy the orders and execute them aren't front-running them either. You can only front-run a
531.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
If you're doing anything other than passively buying index funds, you're probably screwing yourself , but your choice of broker is irrelevant. As a small-time, retail investor, you are statistically guaranteed to make random, uni
532.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Of course not. That's 1) deeply illegal and 2) wouldn't even be profitable. Edit: I love how I'm getting downvoted for stating the truth. Nothing gets people with no knowledge of financial markets as irrationally excited as H
533.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> Why is WeWork considered a tech company? They are considered a tech company (by the people who consider them a tech company) because they say they're a tech company. And they say that because tech companies get higher valuation
534.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> People are just irrational and can't compare things. Fukushima type accident every few years would be completely acceptable and compared to coal and hydrocarbons. You're quite right, but keep in mind that identifying the prob
535.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Fusion is scientifically possible; executing it in a cost effective way is just an engineering challenge. That doesn't mean it'll happen, soon or ever, but it's a valid gamble. Yes, the history of fusion has been long and fu
536.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> to which this study adds one more bit of evidence. This study does not support your conclusion, and so adds no evidence to support that conclusion. It's not even studying the sort of diet you're talking about! > I meant
537.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
Yeah, just some very odd choices. And quite a unpleasant menu to be honest.
538.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
https://www.cell.com/cms/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008/attachme... There's a PDF of the actual menu, although it's just as random. Apparently wheat flour pasta is unprocessed, but a wheat flour tortill
539.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
> Unprocessed is just how it is from plants or animals with little or no alteration. Processed is altered, like through mechanical action or chemical alteration, and also different things mixed together that are not in nature. That'
540.
▲
by
Lazare
7y ago
After a rather surprising amount of digging, I found the underlying study and the menu they used, and it seems there was no set of rules or ingredients. The "ultra-processed" diet included: Canned corn Deli turkey R
More ›