La1n

17 ms·

121.
by La1n 6y ago
It could introduce corruption otherwise too, selling doses that are about to expire to the highest bidder. Which then could introduce incentive to let more doses "expire". I agree that in this case it seems stupid, but the rule is
122.
by La1n 6y ago
Possibly, or at least make it very clear to users that they can still be detected.
123.
by La1n 6y ago
Just fork it isn't useful if they believe this is putting people in danger right now .
124.
by La1n 6y ago
> I'm not convinced that the second use actually exists. Look at the following message from this thread. Arrow quote marker is already there, so it there'd be no reason for the [sic] in my mind. https://news.ycombina
125.
by La1n 6y ago
Discussion from yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26071982
126.
by La1n 6y ago
Some where jailed just for being Instagram "influencers". So it doesn't seem to be just high-profile news outlets.
127.
by La1n 6y ago
Yes? To some people just that fact would be revealing of needing to use Signal, it could be used in prosecution. Especially in the case where most people would not be using it at the moment. Revealing the fact that one uses Signal can be an
128.
by La1n 6y ago
Exactly, according to NGO's people get lashed and jailed for online activities. After Signal has been blocked being detected could actually endanger peoples life. https://freedomhouse.org/country/iran/freedom-
129.
by La1n 6y ago
>It's overblown, I think. https://freedomhouse.org/country/iran/freedom-net/2019 >Several harsh prison sentences were handed down during the reporting period in retaliation for online activities. M
130.
by La1n 6y ago
> this can't possibly put peoples lives in more danger than using signal without a proxy a week ago would've. I see one reason it could, it filters out people who do "need" to use it. It could even be people who did n
131.
by La1n 6y ago
What could have been the more productive way? If their issues are closed (and Signal does not seem interested in discussing this) and they feel like this is actively putting peoples lives in danger I feel they should call this out.
132.
by La1n 6y ago
>diversity of thought and opinions. I don't think so, HN has a pretty specific audience. Just like reddit opinions that don't follow groupthink are often downvoted.
133.
by La1n 6y ago
Yes? Just because other things happen more often doesn't mean something isn't an issue.
134.
by La1n 6y ago
>if they use the same salt for each password then the article is correct(ish). Wouldn't it be a pepper then? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_(cryptography) edit: nvm, it seems the main difference is a pepp
135.
by La1n 6y ago
>so when they take their more money to the market, they bid up the prices of goods and end up where they started, sometimes even a bit further behind. I haven't seen any evidence that this actually happens to a significant degree, c
136.
by La1n 6y ago
You could say the exact same from the employers side. They would love to pay people nothing if they could, but they need to make sure the employee gains the minimum benefit to keep them working.
137.
by La1n 6y ago
>In fact, by twisting a business so that it is run for the benefit of the employees instead of for the mutual benefit of employees, employer, and customers, they destroy value. An union negotiates/help negotiate, an employer would n
138.
by La1n 6y ago
>The real bad actor here is Huawei. Anyone could do this, and there are plenty that would like Huawei to look bad.
139.
by La1n 6y ago
Isn't this kinda inherent in all currencies in a way? Those born in rich families "yielded currency much more quickly".
140.
by La1n 6y ago
>A quick search with my favorite search engine for "bowing to US pressure" returns many results by a variety of reputable outlets. They are mostly (or all I could find on the first pages) about other countries or international
141.
by La1n 6y ago
This website just changed out some words from this BI article, blatant plagiarism. https://www.businessinsider.com/jack-mas-ant-group-plans-shr...
142.
by La1n 6y ago
>Counter-intuitively, limitations drive innovations. When your resources are limited, you are forced to innovate. If this was true you'd see people from poor families being more entrepreneurial than those from rich.
143.
by La1n 6y ago
But the person I replied to didn't talk about overall safety per mile/per plane, they talked about which company has been in the news more for accidents.
144.
by La1n 6y ago
>governments actively circumventing the basic rules of markets. Influential companies actively lobby for those circumventions, this is part of capitalism.
145.
by La1n 6y ago
>Airbus A-380, which is exactly what you would expect to hear anytime you heard about serious accidents or plane crash; the name "Airbus" This [1] seems to disagree with you, searching for Boeing and airbus, there seem to be ma
146.
by La1n 6y ago
>costs a fraction of the cost of lidar What makes lidar for use in self-driving that expensive? I have a robot-vacuum with a lidar that wasn't all that expensive.
147.
by La1n 6y ago
>Europe legislation tightly follows what German carmakers can deliver. Do you have a source for this? Cause it seems to me that they could easily deliver something like summon, seeing as parking-assist/automatic-parking already exis
148.
by La1n 6y ago
>If you're worried, just brush your teeth afterwards. This is a bad suggestion, teeth are a lot more vulnerable after acidic products and as far as I know brushing your teeth right after acidic foods is bad for your enamel.
149.
by La1n 6y ago
90% of drone strikes kill unintended people, are drone operators terrorists? https://www.amnesty.org.uk/thank-you-us-deadly-drones
150.
by La1n 6y ago
>If its for the work they perform they are just one of many. Sure, but that counts for almost anything you can use to like or dislike something or someone, so it's not really useful to bring up.

More ›