La1n

27 ms·

271.
by La1n 6y ago
>Spy all you want, but we're not stealing IP Provably untrue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_espionage#Industria... https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/apr/30/
272.
by La1n 6y ago
If they target a CRO the sponsor still has the original data from the trial sites. I can say that at least for the company (one of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies) I work for this would almost be impossible to not be caught.
273.
by La1n 6y ago
Instead of seeing it as leasing a portion of your home to your company looks at it in the words the law uses, the company must provide you with what you need for work. I am sure if they went to court and tried to have their fees for a co-wo
274.
by La1n 6y ago
I think in this analogy the issue I see it that we treat a one-man hut and airport terminal the same. For some buildings it's fine to have higher risks than others. Of course people would need to be educated on those risks, which would
275.
by La1n 6y ago
>The epidemiologists who have been advocating for lockdown have very explicitly ignored all of those sources of mortality entirely. They have only focused on COVID-19-attributable deaths and that's it. Do you have a source for this?
276.
by La1n 6y ago
Not extensive testing and willingness to take responsibility if something goes wrong?
277.
by La1n 6y ago
>Those Zoom links aren't obsolete the moment you add a Meet link. You should edit them out though, otherwise you are going to have people click the link they always used to click.
278.
by La1n 6y ago
>Yes. Censorship is worse than any falsehood that might circulate. That was not the question. The question was, are people losing their lives worth having no censorship of a specific topic.
279.
by La1n 7y ago
>It was (to my knowledge) the only suspected source for quite a while Yes, but the only suspect does not mean conclusive evidence. >Plus, China knew as early as 31 December that the "novel coronavirus" was related to SARS (l
280.
by La1n 7y ago
> there were warnings from Taiwan about human-to-human transmission very early on This has been proven to not be true. They had no more information than anyone, and the WHO also did not exclude the possibility of H2H at any point.
281.
by La1n 7y ago
But the thing is, that was their stance. I agree that their tweet might show a lack of scientific communication skills or scientific education of the general public, the official recommendations have been very clear. Countries and public he
282.
by La1n 7y ago
>That's a very strong and very stupid claim. Alright, show us some peer reviewed studies, preferably a meta-analysis, that shows it's stupid. edit:sp
283.
by La1n 7y ago
>This is the free-market, libertarian position. It is the status quo. Which in this case is free-market.
284.
by La1n 7y ago
>saying there’s no evidence of human to human transmission Saying there is preliminary research that gives no clear evidence of it. Stop twisting the words
285.
by La1n 7y ago
Stuff like this is what really annoys me with Hacker News, imagine a public health official reading programming recommendations, not understanding half and making declarations that it's misinformation. You claim they claimed it does no
286.
by La1n 7y ago
>Knowing that if you take longer, he can bill you more is actually a net good, IMO. You can easily flip that around too. The healthcare system would become less efficient because time spend gets valued instead of results.
287.
by La1n 7y ago
So it's basically blackmail? If you don't pay we will let your family and friends know? Cause the whole reminder thing sounds like a thin veil covering that, seeing as you remind them already. It's not about the reminder.
288.
by La1n 7y ago
Like a fact statement.
289.
by La1n 7y ago
For the people that don't like clicking links: >Nearly 20,000 people are being tested every day for coronavirus in South Korea, more people per capita than anywhere else in the world. >The whole process from test tube to test res
290.
by La1n 7y ago
I think most people are better suited to be treated like humans and not be exploited. Calling it "startup culture" does not make it any better.
291.
by La1n 7y ago
The comment you reply to is [flagged] and [dead], while not done by the government it is still censored.
292.
by La1n 7y ago
>The US could operate similarly but we usually expect a warrant for such access but I think there is a big push in the US govt to expand access as well. With PRISM starting data collection from Google more than 10 years ago I think expec
293.
by La1n 7y ago
>He didn't take the money from anyone So he summoned it out of thin air
294.
by La1n 7y ago
As someone who doesn't know a lot about this stuff, is there a way to have the base load internal and use a cloud provider for elastic load?
295.
by La1n 7y ago
This isn't only happening there, a lot of Wikipedia pages basically have someone revert a lot of changes they don't agree with, while you could bring this up on the talk page this takes a lot of time and knowledge about how Wikipe
296.
by La1n 7y ago
But 23andme will always show some differences, while individual SNPs have high accuracy >99% due to the amount that is being tested you will always have some results that are wrong. Multiple testing problem is an issue here.
297.
by La1n 7y ago
Alternate history is fun to think about, but again, nothing more than speculation and fiction.
298.
by La1n 7y ago
>If the US simply 'did not exist' - Russian Imperialism would reach just about as far as in the Soviet era We can speculate a lot, but that's a this is, speculation. This comment and a lot of others smell of American excep
299.
by La1n 7y ago
>Without big bully to prevent countries doing deals that decrease stability in other countries we have no recourse. The problem here is that many do argue right now that the US is doing this themselves and is a large factor in lots of in
300.
by La1n 7y ago
Ukraine is not a Baltic state, the Baltic states (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia) are all in the EU and NATO members. No way the EU would let that slide.

More ›