Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LZ_Khan
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
Im just confused how such a mediocre project came out of such a big budget.
32.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
Damn the narrative was just at "we are entering RSI" and this week all of a sudden it changed to "Transformers hit a wall AI winter is coming." Very suspicious.
33.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
Gemini does it but not in a sensationalized way. More like "Would you like to know more about XYZ, or circumstances that led to situation XYZ?"
34.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
How come all the departed researchers are Chinese nationals?
35.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
After seeing the type of people he hired for doge.. yikes.
36.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
AI comments are certainly bad for discourse on HN. But who's to be the judge of AI or human? Are you reading humanity's Jeff Dean or computerized Elon Musk? It's certainly a tricky situation to be in!
37.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
It's fine except for their argument that it makes people less safe. If they want to disallow encryption they don't need to lie to people while they're at it.
38.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
7mo ago
OpenAI's just trading equity for GPU credits at this point?
39.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
But also a billion users is ChatGPT's biggest weakness. So many free users burning compute up. So many incentives to nerf the intelligence to affordable levels. Sounds like a nightmare.
40.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
A very obvious and likely to happen strategy is to turn the emotional manipulation dial up. Make users more dependent on validation and attention the model provides. They're already doing it, but wonder how far they'll take it.
41.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
At least they're paying. OpenAI should have the largest IP settlement, they just would rather contest it and not pay for eternity.
42.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
The crazy thing is, the blatant AI generated replies with unnecessary gravitas and cliche writing are just the obvious ones. Those are probably replies crafted by non-English speaking scammers from India / Russia / China. There&#x
43.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
that's fair!
44.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
If you care about improvement of models, you would support the US labs here. It costs hundreds of millions of dollars to train a frontier model. It's not just "scraping the web." Distillation allows labs to replicate these re
45.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
biggest problem is that it's slow. also safety seems overtuned at the moment. getting some really silly refusals. everything else is pretty good.
46.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
Improving the UI would only take you a few prompts
47.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
No, TSLA purposely does not list the details of the incident.
48.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
8mo ago
I do this but instead in a google doc. Even better because I can use LLM's to query it aftewards.
49.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
10mo ago
well this will probably cause an exit of businesses
50.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
10mo ago
No. actually no company on earth has solved the voice assistant thing yet
51.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
10mo ago
Don't they distill directly off OpenAI/Google outputs?
52.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
11mo ago
Woah, metr results look impressive. Still looking exponential
53.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
11mo ago
all i care about is performance on metr benchmark
54.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
11mo ago
Waymo is overly conservative last time I checked. Driving the speed limit basically means getting to your destination twice as slow.
55.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
1y ago
+1 and a product manager
56.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
1y ago
I'd say the fact that I'm unable to show purchase intention without being accused of being a shill proves my point.
57.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
1y ago
This is such a steep price tag. I loved what Jeremy Howard put up on fast.ai and respect the heck out of his team, but I've seen too many people scammed by online courses that sell a dream. This one seems to be selling a dream as well.
58.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
1y ago
I agree. I personally do not actually think Mr. Kirk was past the line. But for example Hitler and other demagogues were past that line.
59.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
1y ago
Also Amodei has an assumption that a 100m model will make 200m of revenue but a 1B model will make 2B of revenue. Does that really hold up? There's no phenomenon that prevents them from only making 200m of revenue off a $1B model.
60.
▲
by
LZ_Khan
1y ago
It seems like you burned out on writing this comment
More ›