Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Kwantuum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
> That would let you support "reviewer:person@foo.bar" It's very weird to me that you would use reviewer as your example because that's pretty much the exact point of the signoff feature.
92.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
I don't think that's true. I've been using git's CLI since I started using git a few years ago, and exactly zero of my problems with git could've been solved by a different user interface (be it GUI or a "bette
93.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
But you can't fill out the checklist "correctly", that's the entire point. A lot of these points are mutually exclusive, and which point to pick is a matter of conviction a lot of the time. Some of these points can be
94.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
Is this really doing something complicated enough that I need an account for it? And why would I ever want to make an account with no demo or any idea of what this thing does and is about aside from two vague sentences?
95.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
Those work as well with the function layer, and the function key doesn't make the combo harder on your hands but I can understand wanting dedicated keys for some stuff, this is why I went for a 65% instead of 60% in the first place
96.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
The answer is pretty straight forward: programming scales in a way none of the cited jobs do.
97.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
65% might work for you. I have a tada68, and it has arrow keys, page up/down and delete. Has the added benefit of getting rid of the function key row (but you can still use them using the fn key), the home and end keys are also pretty
98.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
That is just not true.
99.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
There might be some misunderstanding about what "the biggest" means: they have the largest proportion of commits to their name, percentage-wise, they don't have a majority of the total commits. Ie, the founder has around 1-2%
100.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
You will notice that I explicitly unpacked the generator object in the brackets below the generator function by prefixing it with an asterisk.
101.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
You can achieve the same thing in python by using two lambdas (which is actually what you're doing in JS with map): >>> powers_of_x = [(lambda i: (lambda x: x**i))(i) for i in range(10)] >>> [f(2) for f in pow
102.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
I do.
103.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
Depending on how small, a patreon-like solution might work, express that you're open to feature requests but that you can't justify it without compensation.
104.
▲
by
Kwantuum
7y ago
Quote from the article: > Often, as we revel in stories of start-up founders who struggled their way through on cups of ramen before the tide finally turned on viral product launches, high team performance or strategic partnerships, we f