Kuinox

58 ms·

841.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Thanks, I didn't knew about D (I did little to no research on other languages yet). I will read it, but mind that, I said "general purpose" I don't want this to be a language used to be only used as a Database. The whole
842.
by Kuinox 5y ago
I'm a C# dev, I know well LINQ. LINQ has multiples issues compared to what I want to do. It's slow (at leat 1000x slower than a for loop) There is no query optimizer by default, and even less a runtime query optimiser. It's d
843.
by Kuinox 5y ago
It's been a while i'm thinking about one: A Relational General Purpose Language. Not table oriented like SQL, but more OOP/Type oriented, I'm not sure exactly how I want it to be, but surely not table oriented. No concur
844.
by Kuinox 5y ago
It's funny how people complained about github copilot 'stealing' people code, but nobody here complained about this AI 'stealing' artworks. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against this, but I think we should
845.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Doesn't know the word "femto": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femto-
846.
by Kuinox 5y ago
It's averaged over 365 days. Selecting 10/1 day show a different story: DuckDuckGo progress as stagnated in 2021.
847.
by Kuinox 5y ago
> would be allowing simultaneous use of multiple versions of a library Thats called private dependency, and overusing it lead to the node_modules hell (because it was/is the default on npm). IMO, a way to reduce maintenance on updat
848.
by Kuinox 5y ago
in mice.
849.
by Kuinox 5y ago
You are nitpicking examples thats follow what you think, and is typical for someone highly biaised. On [0], you take one example, while forgotting to says thats the majority of nuclear fuel come from developed country (Canada, Russia, Austr
850.
by Kuinox 5y ago
*Citation & sources needed.
851.
by Kuinox 5y ago
"physically moving the mouse/controller". Yes you can do that. It cause 2 issues: In competition, cheating will be impractical (cheating would imply bringing it's own hardware). Cheating will be harder, because y
852.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Thats totally false. Moderns OS have a chain of trust, on windows, the drivers starts and all drivers know the other loaded drivers, and they whitelist the drivers.
853.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Ah, yes, I remember clearly, server run by actual people that kicked you because you were "too good" and "obviously cheating".
854.
by Kuinox 5y ago
For those complaining here: It's for the anti cheat. The anticheat has to start with the OS, or it cannot trust the current OS instance. This is the (current) price to pay if you want a cheater-less game. I predict it will worsen, an
855.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Right click copy is faster.
856.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Context needed. This is the cost to get the tools and craftsmenship to build it, thats we lost.
857.
CSemVer – Constrained Semantic Versioning(csemver.org)
2 points by Kuinox 5y ago|0 comments
858.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Integrate the fact that you pay for transmitted data in the protocol, a company that would setup a cable will passively get money. This make the internet grid a true free market that anyone can participate in.
859.
by Kuinox 5y ago
By making it truly decentralized: Like in a mesh network.
860.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Virtual Desktop run fines and I never needed the Oculus PCVR support.
861.
by Kuinox 5y ago
No, but TPM would allow unavoidable hardware ban. So when someone is caught, with manual review for example, they won't be able to play again on the same hardware.
862.
by Kuinox 5y ago
War Thunder is more realist than WoT, so people will want even more realism.
863.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Ahem what, anti-authoritarian mean "right wing" ? That's far from the truth. Left/right came from the French revolution, the left wanted the king death, king being the symbol of authority in the country.
864.
by Kuinox 5y ago
" In 2015 in the United States, a course of three doses could cost over $1,000, while in Europe a course costs around €100." Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabies_vaccine#Cost )
865.
by Kuinox 5y ago
Yes, but no. If your protocol or your implementations have holes, you may loose messages because of that, and in a lot of applications, it's unacceptable to have the transport protocol dropping packets.
866.
by Kuinox 5y ago
With mqtt you may do that with retained messages. The emitter of a message mark the message as to be retained. The server will retain it. Now when your mqtt client will subscribe tout the topic, the server will send the last retained
867.
by Kuinox 5y ago
It will work fine for your small scale IoT, but when they said "for IoT" they never meant it for high scale.
868.
by Kuinox 5y ago
The Packet ID logic is not enough restricted. For exemple, the emitter is not restricted in the ID it should use for it's packet, it can be any unsigned 16 bit number. In contrast, a lot of protocol the ID must be incremental, and the
869.
by Kuinox 5y ago
To never loose a packet on QoS 1/2.
870.
by Kuinox 5y ago
That when you use QoS 2 "ExactlyOnce" (or 1), you will never loose a message.

More ›