KronisLV

51 ms·

451.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Been using it for a while, older versions had memory leaks with multiple monitors (or virtual monitors too), nowadays seems better. Supports various video encoders, various bitrate settings, allows sharing clipboard (though still has an ann
452.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
How would you use good naming to explain this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_inverse_square_root#Overv... Or how would you name methods and variables to explain why some payment reconciliation process skips matchin
453.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Meanwhile, some colleagues: "Code should have as little comments as possible, the code should explain itself." (conceptually not wholly wrong, but it can only explain HOW not WHY and even then often insufficiently) all while havin
454.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Nowadays I use a lot of Iosevka. Previously I was on Ubuntu and JetBrains Mono, both are great fonts. A bit of PT Mono as well, even Terminus for a bit. One of my favorites has got to be Liberation Mono though - the most readable font I’ve
455.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> So for me, it's really, really useful for Claude to be able to send Slack messages and emails or make pull requests. Oh, I'm totally not arguing for cutting off other capabilities, I like tool use and find it to be as useful
456.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> Regardless of OS, they all seem extremely fast, and feel faster and faster as time goes on. This very much depends on what hardware you have and what you're doing on it (how much spare capacity you have). Back in university I had
457.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Maybe Anthropic (or some collection of the large AI orgs, like OpenAI and Anthropic and Google coming together) should apply patches on top of (or fork altogether) the coreutils and whatever you normally get in a userland - a bit like what
458.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
It's not intended to be a misrepresentation, as much as it is to use exaggeration to call attention to how suggestions like > "You are the face of the machine that I am trying to deal with. If you don't want to be that fac
459.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> if you don't want to be that face, go be the face of some other machine How dare someone take a job that isn’t very nice just to afford a living! That said, everyone kind of sucks in the situation. The Karen should have been nic
460.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded a potential adversary and saboteur of the U.S. for expressing disagreement with the government What issue do you take with that stat
461.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> What we need is accountability and ties to real-world identity. Who's gonna enforce that? > If you're compromised, you're burned forever in the ledger. Guess we can't use XZ utils anymore cause Lasse Collin got p
462.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Sure! Slightly edited the tone, but I’m noticing that often people have idealistic attitudes about FOSS until they get burnt by bad faith actors or even just indifferent corps that have to keep the lights on. Quite unfortunate, definitely n
463.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
I think the comment on corpos is good, but calling the naive people fools might be unnecessary - it’s probably not their fault nobody told them about this sort of thing before and learning that lesson is probably disappointing enough alread
464.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> Every project now seems to carry more coordination overhead than execution time, and when it fails the postmortem just recommends more collaboration... Or it gets stuck in code review cause one colleague likes nitpicking everything end
465.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> It's weird to see people getting fixated on the DDoS, which is obviously far less nasty than actually attempting to dox someone. Why even do that, then? Why not just make a public post of theirs like: "Hey, here's someon
466.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> “JS developers bad“ I found it to be a nice post that documents why things sometimes are bad. It didn’t feel accusatory at the developers themselves, but seemed to serve as a reasonable critique of the status quo?
467.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> This view is grounded in the assumption that the future will be better than today. There is no guarantee of that. It could be better, it could be flawed in the same ways, it could be flawed but in different ways, or it could be worse a
468.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> it isn't that hard, depends mostly on your ego This feels like an odd cope, sure I might not be able to do anything about my mortality, but I still view the fact that I and other people are mortal as a damn tragedy (and often the
469.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> Each time the brain fails a captcha, the brain receives an electric impulse which simulates the most excruciating pain that the brain can respresent, but the brain cannot scream or run away. What percentage of your life being enjoyable
470.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> very soon turns into a thousand reinvented wheels strapped together by tape. Also most of the long running enterprise projects I’ve seen - there was one that had been around for like 10 years and like about 75% of the devs I hadn’t eve
471.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Sounds pretty sane, the same way how OpenWebUI and probably other software out there also has a concept of “tool models”, something you use for all the lower priority stuff. Actually curious to hear what others think about why Anthropic is
472.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
This might also be why I heard colleagues saying “Nono, listen, these ‘N+1 problems’ and our nested service calls aren’t an issue because it works well enough” until it eventually didn’t. I’d rather not have bad code in any language. Modern
473.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
With Anthropic, you either pay per token with an API key (expensive), or use their subscription, but only with the tools that they provide you - Claude, Claude Cowork and Claude Code (both GUI and CLI variants). Individuals generally get to
474.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Delphi is commercial: https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi/product-editions Lazarus is free with no artificial limitations, for FreePascal: https://www.lazarus-ide.org/
475.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
I've been writing my own linter that's supposed to check projects regardless of the technology (e.g. something that focuses on architecture and conventions, alongside something like Oxlint/Oxfmt and Ruff and so on), with Go a
476.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> OpenCode is awesome. Claude Code is nothing special at all. It's weird, my experience is the exact opposite: OpenCode had the weirdest issue of interpreting C:\Users\some-user\Documents\Projects\... as a bunch of escaped character
477.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
Hey that’s pretty cool, nice to see someone paying attention to Docker Swarm (it’s nice for simple deployments, like multi-server Compose). You might want to add some screenshots to the docs though. There was also Swarmpit but it didn’t rea
478.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> because we typically want to know the writer of a piece. we want to know where to lay credit. Does the average person really do care all the time? Maybe the outlet it comes from as a whole (factuality, political lean) but more rarely t
479.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> You just set up CI/CD on GitHub and have it dump an image into ghcr it’s trivial. Claude excells at seeing up workflows. I don't know why anyone bothers with Dockerhub at all really. Probably because Docker Hub has great disc
480.
by KronisLV 7mo ago
> Which cool, great, I sure love "pip install"ing every time instead of just baking a single container image with it already installed. Obviously the correct thing for such a use case would be building their own image with what

More ›