Krei-se

6 ms·

61.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
True. If you stay in your domain for a very long time the people with you in that niche space are less and less and when you solve something that wasn't done before it's not necessarily a hard problem. Still there's no reason
62.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
If only we had a battle tested against reality self learning system.
63.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/870.jpeg you can easily see that at the doubling rate every 2 years in 2020 we already had over 5 facebook accounts per human on earth.
64.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
Did you just state that FP cannot solve the problem because some protocol wont allow you to specify types in the manner?
65.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
You my friend need more milewski in your life and let go of the idea that code and data are different things.
66.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
I was hoping for discussion and got a zero content kneejerk response
67.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
Thats actually how its done! You accept all schemas in your db and default value or afterfit around old interfaces to keep compatibility. You never really write directly ofc so maybe the author is confused as to how FP handles this. For a c
68.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
The version problem is solved well in FP by catching the old function and translating it cleanly. This ofc also works with data representation. Im not sure what the point of the post is. Minimizing side effects in your code (keeping functio
69.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
Theres just no point arguing anymore so i just stopped. These tools can by design not work the way its advertised but if you point that out youll be hit with walls of generated "arguments" why it will be different any day now.
70.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
The author has a github.
71.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
Because its a clone.
72.
by Krei-se 8mo ago
I find myseld using dumber free models more as they reply instantly and keep me learning. Some local models run well already too and do the job. Not sure if i would pay any money when a discarded mac can run these just fine already. This ma
73.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
Very good read and great ideas, thanks a bunch. Id like to add my personal #1: Change all environment you come across to the better. I pick up trash, remove the rusty nail, small stuff like that can go a long way.
74.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
Im middle aged and look forward to a bright future. Because a) its bad to give up. What if stuff turns out well? You still lose. So i plan for good things to happen. But b) is bigger. Energy is getting cheaper and renewable. Even if we just
75.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
It's highly abstract(!) thinking and in contrast to a calculation now comes with no clean explanation too.
76.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
You should doubt however loud shouting means good programming. Here have some actual skill https://github.com/PCBox/PCBox This guy is half his age and keeps to himself. Pure quality.
77.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
On the plus side having people listening to influencers calling interpreter languages programming languages you get more job security if they distract enough newcomers to never go bit flipping manually. I understand your point and how frust
78.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
Its learned from synthetic training sets generated by iterating over sources variables or structures, modifying them until the code does not compile, then taking the compilers result as the output. This does not make the learned rules bette
79.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
i took the time to review your python wasm project and restate the fact that you seem to have 0 idea about how a compiler works. Its simple and rigid rules an AI can pick up easily. If you lack this knowledge people that have it will simply
80.
by Krei-se 9mo ago
You can stop questioning yourself early whether you are a good programmer just by realizing you code in python.
81.
by Krei-se 10mo ago
If its a peer to you now the Ai has evolved while you didn't
82.
by Krei-se 10mo ago
Insanely difficult to you maybe because you stopped learning. What you cannot create you don't understand.
83.
by Krei-se 10mo ago
I think you can tell from some answers here that people talk to these models a lot and adapt their language structure :( Means they stop asking themselves whether it makes any sense what they ask the model for. It does not turn middle manag
84.
Show HN: Real 4D Editor [video](youtube.com)
1 points by Krei-se 1y ago|0 comments
85.
by Krei-se 1y ago
Read the logs from Gmail and Microsoft, they will tell you exactly why the mail was filtered. Act on that problem and have your mail appear in inboxes. It's usually relaxed DMARC triggering Microsoft. Gmail accepts relaxed.
86.
by Krei-se 1y ago
I add it here so you can successful self-host: You need strict DMARC for Microsoft. If you change the header on your relay DMARC relaxed filters will pass the mail, but not strict. Because this adds the need to sign every single mail for ev
87.
by Krei-se 1y ago
No, that's because your relay overwrites part of the header which makes dkim strict break. Change to relaxed or don't modify the header on your relay. Outlook business will accept your mail, Outlook private may filter, but the rat
88.
by Krei-se 1y ago
I have a writeup in german about self-hosting current and with debian trixie on https://krei.se/Doc If you do it yourself and do it correct it's a pleasure. I have automatic updates with automatic reboot, tailored syst
89.
by Krei-se 1y ago
Configure the dmarc reports, they tell you a lot and automatically why someone swallowed your mail.
90.
by Krei-se 1y ago
It's not reasonable. Mail not deliverable is not the same as house burned down, recipient moved unknown or sth, it simply means the letter was not received. Who and why messed up is unknown, thus NO mail server will mark you down after

More ›