Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Kranar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
391.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
I think you're mixing up quite a lot of things here. For one, apart from the impreciseness of your statement of the decision problem, it wouldn't be a decision problem for ECDLP but rather for the more general discrete logarithm p
392.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
It is not known if the decision problem for ECDLP is in NP, in fact it's likely not in NP. NP-hard does not mean NP, it means a problem that is ATLEAST as hard as NP. NP-hard problems that are in NP are known as NP-Complete. Finally EC
393.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
The decision problem for ECDLP is not known to be NP-complete, in fact it's likely not NP-complete but rather NP-hard and therefore proving that P = NP would not provide any insight into finding a polynomial time solution for it.
394.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
> So no, these are not comparably paying jobs. And one does not "easily" earn more than a physician simply by enjoying learning. To become a physician requires on the order of half a million dollars in tuition not to mention th
395.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
With GPT 4 it nailed it on the first try: >3 hens lay 3 eggs in 3 days. How many eggs do 12 hens give in 12 days? >Let's break down the given information and solve this problem step by step. We know that 3 hens lay 3 eggs in 3 da
396.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
Intent/mens rea doesn't work like that unless the law explicitly specifies so. By default intent simply means intent to perform an act, as opposed to intent to cause harm. In some specific cases, like murder, intent to cause harm
397.
▲
by
Kranar
3y ago
No.
398.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
My reply is just as informative and insightful as your original comment, in fact the entire purpose of that metaphor was to respond with the exact same precision and using the exact same structure as you did and the fact that you find it to
399.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I tried driving a car for the first time today. I just wanted to drive from my house to the end of the block. I crashed into a fire hydrant and almost killed three people. This should be a very simple and common task, going from your house
400.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
It's on their front page: https://www.foxnews.com/media/fox-news-media-dominion-voting...
401.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You are correct, but as I mentioned in my post, transactions happen within a matter of minutes on decentralized exchanges.
402.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
It's funny you mention FTX, because FTX was exactly the opposite of a decentralized exchange. It was a centralized exchange that was unambiguously under the jurisdiction of the SEC. One of the major advantages of using a decentralized
403.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
One important lesson I learned is to never ask ChatGPT about itself, it only seems to makes things up.
404.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You don't go to MIT for the education. There is absolutely nothing you will learn at MIT that you can't learn on your own or at any other college. You go to MIT because MIT is a social filter that gives you access to world class o
405.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You appear the be incorrect according to the latest statistics I could find from the Bureau of Justice Statistics [1]. Most violent crimes are committed by someone known to the victim (defined as an acquaintance, friend, family member, or i
406.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Do you have any references for how I can do this?
407.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Oh God, when the iPhone came out people were raging "But it doesn't have a keyboard!" It's so hard for people, including myself, to look at the future potential of a technology. My attitude is to simply keep an open mind
408.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I feel like this is the Seinfeld is Unfunny effect, where something that's been woven into the very fabric of a certain field is then found to be underwhelming or cliche, because it's been copied and iterated upon so many times. B
409.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I sympathize with your view, I genuinely do, but to write out formal methods using natural language expressions results in quite a few problems. For one, it results in incredibly long proofs, like this simple proof written out in natural la
410.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I disagree. A curve can be closed that is either timelike or spacelike. The interest in timelike curves is that it hypothetically can result in time travel whereas spacelike curves do not describe the trajectory of physical objects. Closed
411.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You are incorrect on this point. A spacetime interval is defined as: ds^2 = c * dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2 If ds^2 > 0 then the interval is timelike. If ds^2 = 0 then the interval is lightlike. If ds^2 < 0 then the interval is spacelik
412.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
A series of claims have been made that can be objectively tested for their veracity, namely that pasting information, whether from Wikipedia or another source, is a way of ensuring that ChatGPT does not make false claims, or as OP stated it
413.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
This is an unusual comment to say the least. It suggests that unless GPT4 can somehow independently derive facts entirely on its own, then it's nothing more than an overfit model, almost as if to say that it's basically just a kin
414.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Not exactly sure what you're arguing here but it seems to be going off topic. You can't give ChatGPT a Wikipedia article and ask it to give you facts based off of it. Ignoring its context window, even if you paste a portion of an
415.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You can't feed anything more than a fairly short Wikipedia article into ChatGPT, its context window isn't remotely close to big enough to do that. It also doesn't change the point that copying data has no effect. You could ju
416.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Here is a link to a website that explains how ChatGPT doesn't actually read websites, but it pretends like it can: https://simonwillison.net/2023/Mar/10/chatgpt-internet-acces...
417.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You could also just ask it: "What years did the Mets when the NL East division?" Without any reference to anything and it will give you the correct answer as well. You have been duped into believing that ChatGPT reads websites. It
418.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Yes, this is a common misconception. ChatGPT can not actually read URLs you give it. It does have some awareness of websites based on its training, so it can in some sense relate a URL you provide to it with its subject matter, but when you
419.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You can't give ChatGPT a Wikipedia article though.
420.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>Pick a a stable, guaranteed-to-exist, shard key (composite or atomic properties) and use that. This is a pretty risky approach since it's almost certainly the case that you won't end up evenly distributing your data across sha
More ›