KorematsuFredt

35 ms·

151.
by KorematsuFredt 5y ago
Humans have survived this long because of that constant paranoid behaviour. I think we are programmed to love doom and gloom predictions. But more importantly, it is an excellent tool in the hands of academicians and politicians to demand m
152.
by KorematsuFredt 5y ago
First of all thank you for writing a detailed answer. Clearly you have taken a lot of efforts and been very articulate. > Your position ignores the fact that being the 1T gorilla in the room gives them significant advantages that, to the
153.
by KorematsuFredt 5y ago
Let me respond to the second portion first. > That seems to presuppose a particular truth without actually presenting any evidence. What I have said is mostly classical economics 101. If the point is Google could innovate faster if it is
154.
by KorematsuFredt 5y ago
No. Most efficient allocation of resources happens in a free market, not in an overly regulated market. (Of course exceptions exist due to externalities but we are not arguing those here.) There are many good examples here. First one that c
155.
by KorematsuFredt 5y ago
> but it seems entirely reasonable that asking for select people to be killed is crossing a meaningful line. There is enough legal and philosophical body of work around that question. But either ways it is not a meaningful reason for &qu
156.
by KorematsuFredt 5y ago
In that case you have more terrible scenario where you have certain companies who are not interested in becoming too large. The innovation happens outside the parent company as a separate entity. You end up having lego pieces that come toge