Kliment

180 ms·

1651.
by Kliment 17y ago
http://www.flightcaster.com/
1652.
by Kliment 17y ago
Whenever I see something like this I'm reminded of the introduction to "Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision", which is where a lot of this "clever math" is described. Essentially, problems considered unsolvable ten years ago are not o
1653.
by Kliment 17y ago
This is terrible. Also, a great way to get high scores in games that use it.
1654.
by Kliment 17y ago
Well, that was the joke, it was a play on while(True). It's an infinite loop, because you can never detect truth. And neither Hertz nor Mach said anything about usefulness. Also, I wonder why I can only think of physicists when thinking abo
1655.
by Kliment 17y ago
Oh hell, definitions of science. There goes the planet. Arguing about definitions can take all day, since all definitions are true by assumption. Let's try and find out what's happening here. Feynman says science is the belief in the ignor
1656.
Advertisers attempt to poison online conversations.(techcrunch.com)
20 points by Kliment 17y ago|1 comments
1657.
by Kliment 17y ago
What doesn't make sense to me here: 1. Why has nobody done this before? It seems trivial technically. The only good reason I can think of is that the Twitter crowd and the PowerPoint crowd and the Visual Studio crowd do not intersect enough
1658.
by Kliment 17y ago
These deals tend to fall apart over time though, as the content quality differential fades. If you are the only channel (or network) offering a certain content (or device) then you win by keeping it as a bundle. But both content and mobile
1659.
by Kliment 17y ago
Well, the thing is, design scales. Having a single person doing design is not a limit to scalability. Having a single person doing customer support, or sales, or implementation can be. Crowds of geniuses tend to lead to the opposite of scal