Klathmon

82 ms·

751.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Why do you need to "make them afraid"? Why is your feelings toward privacy the only correct one? Owning a keyboard is potentially "giving everything you type to a company". Connecting to the internet at all is possibly g
752.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I don't know what they mean, but I know that I really dislike how PS's autocomplete works. If the possible commands are (for the sake of discussion) `Get-AppLockerFileInformation` and `Get-AppLockerPolicy`. If you type `Get-App` a
753.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Well Daft Punk are different. They are very well known, and they don't hide their identities any more than a voice actor for a cartoon is hiding their identity. Satoshi as far as I know is still unknown, and while there are some pretty
754.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I want to warn against this. My biggest "issue" with remote working is always when there are differing amounts of remote work within teams. When you have half the engineers in office, and half remote, the 2 sides end up with commu
755.
by Klathmon 8y ago
For me, Wacom tablets or tablet-with-stylus kinds of devices. Now it's not only a whiteboard, but I can take screenshots, collaborate with countless others, undo, search, zoom and pan infinitely, etc... And they can be had for around $
756.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Which isn't legal in many parts of the world, especially if you take any kind of payment for your services.
757.
by Klathmon 8y ago
SO often can take hours to weeks for a good answer, and that's assuming it doesn't just get closed as a dupe when the other one doesn't answer the question. A good "guy" (or girl!) is a phone call away and can often
758.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I can't speak to the product, but I did interview and worked a trial week at knack about a year ago and they are a very bright group of people that are hell-bent on making and maintaining a great product.
759.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Sorry, that is what I meant by attribution (which is defined as the copyright and license in MIT). >IANAL, but sublicensing can only impose additional clauses, it cannot roll back any grants or restrictions of the original license. Yeah,
760.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Yes, but those conditions start and end at requiring attribution. MIT already allows sublicensing, so a CLA for an MIT project (assuming nothing else shady is going on) really only buys them the ability to change future licenses to somethin
761.
by Klathmon 8y ago
If i'm reading you right, the implication is that if you sign a CLA for an MIT license codebase, they could retroactively close-source your code contributions? My understanding of MIT and other permissive licenses like it is that if I
762.
by Klathmon 8y ago
yeah i've just recently started heavily using it for the first time in a few years, and it's not bad! It has a fair share of issues (it's SO SLOW to do just about everything, and the text editor annoys me to no end!), but ove
763.
by Klathmon 8y ago
The main reason is that I've had to re-implement it on the server side 2 times now by sheer "luck", as well as I feel like i've just hit more of the edge cases than most just because of the areas I ended up working in (w
764.
by Klathmon 8y ago
This is an awesome overview! But don't take it as all encompassing, it doesn't go into some of the more esoteric edge cases with CORS, like: * either an unreleased safari version, or the most recent version will send preflight req
765.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Are you sure? That's a pretty insane security issue if it's true! Content-Type should only be allowed to be `application/x-www-form-urlencoded`, `multipart/form-data`, or `text/plain` to be allowed without preflight
766.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I believe the Edge team is actively working on open sourcing the whole browser. They have already open-sourced the JS engine behind it [0], and they worked on some integrations with other things (IIRC there was an experiment with node using
767.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Until a new format comes out which requires magnitudes more storage? I can already imagine vr-style videos pushing 8k with huge dynamic range and very high framerates becoming more common if the technology continues to go that direction, an
768.
by Klathmon 8y ago
That's actually another part I should have not included in that rant, because the truth is that healthcare didn't even enter my mind for the most part. I didn't actually even have any medical coverage at all at that point in
769.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Exactly! It's like saying today that 64gb of ram should be enough for just about everyone in their personal machine. In 10 years, that might be a hilariously small number, but for right now, it's way more than the extreme vast maj
770.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Ya know what, you are right. I should remove that part of my comment, because while it's possible to find situations that you could be a week away from losing your house or apartment, it's not as likely as the situations of: * hav
771.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Would you be able to give up your paycheck, knowing that if you don't have another by next week you would literally be homeless? With no savings, no healthcare, no "fallback", no help, nothing. Sit down, and really decide if
772.
by Klathmon 8y ago
That's where stuff like batch inserting the elements (split your table up into groups of 100 elements, and add one every so often to keep the UI smooth), and virtual-rendering (only show the part of the list that is actually visible) a
773.
by Klathmon 8y ago
So if I'm reading it right, it looks like it's trying to replicate the DOM interface almost exactly (but in a web worker)! Which means that any UI library should be able to plug into this system and run mostly off the main thread
774.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I don't like to double post, however after skimming parts of the linked PDF, it turns out that the style of optical scanners you are talking about are actually in there. One of the models (the ES&S M650) might be the actual scanner
775.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I'm not sure I agree that they increase accuracy to the point that it would be worth the downsides. A room full of people who all don't trust one another I feel can do a fairly good job of reducing the errors down to a minimum. Ag
776.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I'm almost positive they would if they could, but the companies making these machines keep and iron grip on them. And sometimes they do so with the threat of very serious criminal charges. It's just another reason why voting machi
777.
by Klathmon 8y ago
But what is the motivation for the optical scanners? Why do away with a system that has proven to work and has known, mitigatable (is that a word?) downsides with one that is consistently found to have dangerous gaps in security and time an
778.
by Klathmon 8y ago
That's fair, but it really feels to me like a kind of "token gesture" that makes it seem like it's in good faith (and could actually be done in good faith!) but keeps all the same underlying issues. After all, a lot of t
779.
by Klathmon 8y ago
And IMO they should do away with "optical ballot scanning", and should move to regular humans counting them with their own eyes. An electronic scanning system could easily be vulnerable to many of the same issues that are presente
780.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I'm on mobile and don't have a link right now, but there was a guy a while back that did a TAS speedrun of I think Pokemon red/blue, and got a full RCE exploit to work, rewrote the cartridge to the play the opening to the nex

More ›