Kiro

8 ms·

121.
by Kiro 7mo ago
Failing 9 out of 10 times for such simple tasks is indeed puzzling. I have no idea what you're doing to achieve that but I'm impressed.
122.
by Kiro 7mo ago
> Crafted like poetry I find this idea that humans all of a sudden write beautiful code very funny. Most code produced by hand is dirty and filled with ugly hacks. The argument might work against AI art but falls flat for programming.
123.
by Kiro 7mo ago
It's not cheap but it's also not unusual for devs to burn $200 a day on tokens.
124.
by Kiro 7mo ago
The best programmers I know are the ones most excited about it. The mediocre programmers who are toxic gate keepers seem to be the ones most upset by it.
125.
by Kiro 7mo ago
I like that style. It's a very efficient way to convey information and ideas. Reposting it as your own text however is obviously not a good idea since it's so easy to recognize.
126.
by Kiro 7mo ago
> If I could give any advice to someone who needs it, I’d tell them to write down the things that have made them happy, and then explore why. > But I really hope to live in a world where my future kids find sitting in front of a recta
127.
by Kiro 8mo ago
And yet people are using it for that, even if it's not rational. I use ChatGPT for some things that would be easier and better to do with other tools out of habit.
128.
by Kiro 8mo ago
> but I've never seen it develop something more than trivial correctly. What are you working on? I personally haven't seen LLMs struggle with any kind of problem in months. Legacy codebase with great complexity and performance-
129.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Yes, so Electron is naturally the best target for any LLM.
130.
by Kiro 8mo ago
LLMs are best at JavaScript.
131.
by Kiro 8mo ago
I personally love that phrasing even if it's a clear tell. Comparisons work well for me to grasp an idea. I also love bullet points. So yeah, I guess I like LLM writing.
132.
by Kiro 8mo ago
"Normal people"? "Big brain master race"? The only one implying weird things here is you.
133.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Our job is not the intellectual exercise you think it is. We're not smarter than anyone else and software development is not automatically more thought-intensive than other jobs. The fact that programming is the first job task to be fu
134.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Just need to point out that the payout is often above 95% at online casinos. As long as it's below 100 the house still wins.
135.
by Kiro 8mo ago
You can fold it, format it, and IDEs preview it. This is like me posting the equivalent CSS in one big line. But even without all that I still prefer this over dealing with cascading styles in stylesheets. Never again.
136.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Yeah, the small local newspaper for my town of 30k is a paid shill for OpenClaw. Amazing comment.
137.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Jumping up and down in the file is not much better and you still need to come up with names for classes. I want to look at an element and immediately know how it's styled.
138.
by Kiro 8mo ago
> We don't know how much of the github stars are bought. We don't know how many twitter followings/tweets are bought. Why this insinuation? The project went massively viral and was even covered in my local newspaper. I don
139.
by Kiro 8mo ago
100% of the code, not 100% of the work.
140.
by Kiro 8mo ago
This is not a popular belief anymore. It used to be mainstream in 2010 but now it's pretty much extinct.
141.
by Kiro 8mo ago
This is not the fantastic argument you think it is. 100% is only achievable if you have software engineers at the helm so there's no contradiction here.
142.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Making a profitable product is so much more than just building it. I've probably made 100+ side projects in my life and only a handful has ever generated any revenue.
143.
by Kiro 8mo ago
> I wonder how our comments will age in a few years. Badly. While I wouldn't assign a task to an LLM that requires such a long running time right now (for many reasons: control, cost etc) I am fully aware that it might eventually be
144.
by Kiro 8mo ago
Exactly. The fact that people laugh at the prediction like it's a joke when I and many others have been at 90%+ for a long time makes me question a lot of the takes here. Anyone serious about using LLMs would know it's nothing con
145.
by Kiro 8mo ago
The discourse around LLMs has created this notion that humans are not lazy and write perfect code. They get compared to an ideal programmer instead of real devs.
146.
by Kiro 8mo ago
LLMs definitely write more robust code than most. They don't take shortcuts or resort to ugly hacks. They have no problem writing tedious guards against edge cases that humans brush off. They also keep comments up to date and obsess ov
147.
by Kiro 8mo ago
What was fake? I don't see anything controversial or factually wrong. I question the prediction but that's his opinion.
148.
by Kiro 8mo ago
I admire your confidence. Must feel good to know you've perfected the craft.
149.
by Kiro 8mo ago
No, I don't but it sounds very similar to the the naysayers that have silently moved the goalposts. That said, you're one of the few people in the wild that still claims LLMs are completely useless so I give you that.
150.
by Kiro 8mo ago
So far it has been accurate though. Models have gotten much better than even the most optimistic predictions.

More ›