Kim_Bruning

193 ms·

1. 2461.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   Isn't this just a ramification of of the dunning-kruger effect? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
2. 2462.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   Well, JSTOR settled with him, later released a lot of documents for free themselves, and have stated that as far as they were concerned the issue was closed. Currently MIT is starting a self-investigation on how they could have done better
3. 2463.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   He did not. He returned the data to JSTOR. Later JSTOR gave away much of the data themselves
4. 2464.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   The model is the same everywhere. We canna break the laws of (bio)physics, Jim.
5. 2465.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   You need (rule-of-thumb) 10* as much energy (solar/light input) or 10* the amount of land for a none-vegetarian diet. In an early off-world colony, that might be prohibitively expensive.
6. 2466.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   Well, imagine if patents included source code and were only valid for 5 years or so? Something like that?
7. 2467.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   we have a chance to find out.
8. 2468.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   Can we agree on the colloquial: "American"=USAian , "European"=EUian ? (And specify otherwise if otherwise?)
9. 2469.▲
   by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

   Yes, that's where it started. :-)
10. 2470.▲
    by Kim_Bruning 14y ago

    What makes you say he has been non-constructive? I can think of GNU, Emacs, The GPL, FSF etc. off the top of my head.