Kbelicius

7 ms·

61.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> We can program an AI to be exactly like that, just being happy from helping others. It seems that you missed the first sentence that GP wrote from which the one you quoted follows.
62.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> It's refreshing to see that the Kagi founder isn't on a political correctness crusade and chooses to focus on product. What does waging wars and committing war crimes have to do with political correctness? Please help me unde
63.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
>> What your bank is doing is clearly illegal. > And there is nothing I can do about it. So your argument for why GDPR is bad is that it is not being followed by all that it applies to... I mean, what do you expect as a response to
64.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> Yes they are. The summons part is essentially what happens when a cop issues you a ticket.. They are reporting, not regulating. You don't get a ticket from a random person. > The more I read about it, the more it seems like a g
65.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
This is called the slippery slope fallacy. It is a fallacy for a reason.
66.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> random people should not be given financial incentives to regulate things they don't understand They aren't regulating...
67.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
I've done those things. > But I also recognize that people are human and make mistakes. But you can't make a mistake while making an illegal U-turn? > I chose the u-turn after doing my best to ensure I wasn't going to p
68.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
This line of reasoning makes no sense. It's a slippery slope fallacy. > An obvious thought is that it will come to be used by ICE to incentivize civilians to report on "illegal immigrants", as defined by Donald. How would
69.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
If you read a headline like this and you think to yourself "this is stupid, what if..." whatever you are thinking of has been, more than likely, covered. It just doesn't fit into the headline. As another poster already remark
70.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
This is becoming a cliche here on HN, to call laws and lawmakers stupid after reading a headline. > I don't idle for fun, I do it to reduce wear and tear. And this law isn't there for fun either. > I'm also sure normies
71.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Yes it would. > longer availability of operating system updates, at least 5 years from the date the last unit model is sold
72.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Neither, it is just a statement of fact.
73.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Things that were once operated as commons became private goods. There is no reason that it can't go the other way.
74.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Don't know anything about the topic but saw you downvoted for asking a question so went down the rabbit hole. Turns out that no, primordial black holes aren't supermassive. In fact one could call them superlight since they could b
75.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
The govt already knocked and Mullvad had nothing to give them.
76.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
The problem is that is also against the rules. GDPR bans using private data as a form of payment. You can give your data away freely but it can't be requested as a form of payment. In this case Meta is asking you to either pay with you
77.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Following your logic there never will be and there never was a traditional banking system because rules and regulation around banking keep getting changed.
78.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> I've always liked this analogy because it accidentally implies something I believe to be true - the crypto industry will eventually overtake transitional finance while moving at great speed. It isn't implying that. It is imp
79.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> 2) AI/automation will increase unemployment. This has never happened and it's doubtful it will ever happen. > The reason is that humans always adapt and find ways to be helpful that automation can't do. That is why af
80.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
It isn't legumes that absorb nitrogen from air. It is bacteria that lives on their roots.
81.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Your second links puts the number of slaves in China at 4 per 1000. The USA is at 3.3 per 1000. Why not mention that the USA could make more use of their slaves?
82.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> The fact that you would even ask this question (and your ridiculous previous comment) shows your ineptitude and how pointless it is to discuss this with you Maybe look in the mirror. The fact that you wrote this instead of writing what
83.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> That's fine. I'm not the one making claims about chatGPTs retention But you did. Here, I'll quote you: "There is no evidence that ChatGPT has a retention problem. Quite the contrary.". That is your claim about
84.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
Oh, well if that is the standard of evidence that is acceptable to you then here is some contradictory evidence. I paid for ChatGPT for 2 months and then canceled it. Did not even bother getting it trough work after that. On a more serious
85.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> Quite the contrary. So what is this evidence that shows that ChatGPT is having good user retention numbers?
86.
by Kbelicius 1y ago
> I’m constantly amazed at the socialist argument that forcibly taking the labor of some people to benefit other people is considered “efficient” That is also the stance of the capitalists. Have you heard of welfare? Now, have you heard
87.
by Kbelicius 2y ago
> The fact that what they’ve been saying all along They weren't saying that all along. They were saying that tariffs are a tool that will be used to reindustrialize the USA.
88.
by Kbelicius 2y ago
The person you are responding to was talking about the EU. It did not exist in the 40s and Spain wasn't a part of it til the 80s. You are really bringing the level of discourse down.
89.
by Kbelicius 2y ago
> This is a political problem: we can easily produce enough food to feed the entire world, but we can't get that food to the places where it is most needed due to political instability. But it's a political problem with an en
90.
by Kbelicius 2y ago
> Hitler's fascism (Hitler was elected) He wasn't elected. By the time he became chancellor his party was losing ground and couldn't form the government. Under pressure of the rich Hitler was appointed chancellor (not elec

More ›