Kamq

14 ms·

121.
by Kamq 3y ago
They're actually perfect examples for this thread. We've already constrained "what we're looking for" to be "niche expert pages" further up thread. If we're seeing niche expert pages even for generic
122.
by Kamq 3y ago
You missed the word "statically" in the post you commented on. Dynamically linked libs rarely contribute heavily to binary bloat
123.
by Kamq 3y ago
I mean, sure, but if you're demanding detailed statistics from the anti-side (the start of this thread), letting the pro-side gesture vaguely in the direction of hard to measure deterrence seems like an isolated demand for rigor.
124.
by Kamq 3y ago
> I mean, sure. And then you can tell ADHD people to just pay attention, then we'll have less ADHD people. If mental illness struggles were this easy, we wouldn't have them. But that's my exact point. That doesn't wor
125.
by Kamq 3y ago
> Trying to convince someone that he is able to process his trauma and continue his life without this burden. I believe it's to help them process the trauma, but if the above position holds, you don't need to do that. Convincin
126.
by Kamq 3y ago
> I frankly, fully agree with the grand-comment here: It's trauma if you think it is. This experience is entirely, 100% subjective and isolated to the inner world of every given person. I keep seeing this, but then nobody actually e
127.
by Kamq 3y ago
If the zero value is valid, I usually just use a pointer to the scalar type in question
128.
by Kamq 3y ago
That's already a thing (in fact, it's guaranteed by the first amendment in the US). Congress can overrule the FCC any time they want.
129.
by Kamq 3y ago
> In theory sure but have you been following Congress for the past decade? On one hand, fair. On the other hand, you can only coast along on the old post-cold war bi-partisan consensus for so long without getting new consensus before ins
130.
by Kamq 3y ago
> I don't expect anything to exist "forever". On one hand, that's kinda fair. Forever is pretty rough. On the other hand, companies probably shouldn't use the word forever when promising things then. I don't
131.
by Kamq 3y ago
According to more up to date reports I got to from that website, none of those years were exceptionally bad. The worst one recently (2020), was slightly worse than 2017, and approximately equal to 2015. It seems to be a trend of more modera
132.
by Kamq 3y ago
> To people who say "Word sux", I say "That just means you don't know how to use Word properly". "Word sux" because it takes forever to start up and I forget what I went there to type. It's like op
133.
by Kamq 3y ago
I just double checked and I read my link completely wrong. That's my bad. It seems you're correct. That'll teach me to post while doing other stuff
134.
by Kamq 3y ago
That seems to contradict the available data. Using gallup: https://news.gallup.com/poll/514310/decades-later-americans-... It seems that a majority doubt the official narrative these days (that LHO acted alone), b
135.
by Kamq 3y ago
I mean, that's kinda fair. But it's also a much lower bar to suspect that a group might be infiltrated when we're talking about an entity with a proven track-record of infiltrating and espionage. Doubly so during the cold war
136.
by Kamq 3y ago
> yet how many capitalist bosses really want you to do much other than implement their "vision?" Most of them? Or, more accurately to my knowledge, most of the ones I've had. I mean, hell, even when I delivered pizza, they
137.
by Kamq 3y ago
> To have a profit in a specific country there have to be enough people with iDevices to start with. Sure, it's necessary, but it isn't sufficient.
138.
by Kamq 3y ago
I don't think they're that bad necessarily. These sorts of vague and fuzzy categories are very common in human communication. Even though there's tons of exceptions and non-central examples to these categories, to the point t
139.
by Kamq 3y ago
The comment you responded to is about profit, not market penetration. You can get a lot of market penetration by having a series of companies spin up, ultimately fail to become profitable, and collapse. Especially with a market that's
140.
by Kamq 3y ago
The thing that immediately pops into mind is that learning to be careful when there's a moderate risk of injury makes people better at finding the limits in dangerous activities that they'll face later in life without going too fa
141.
by Kamq 3y ago
Dijkstra's take was significantly less spicy. The original title was "A Case Against the Goto Statement". Niklaus Wirth is actually the one who changed it (your wikipedia link covers this).
142.
by Kamq 3y ago
> so I don't see why there couldn't be similar international regulations about the disposal of human remains on the moon. Because there's not really a central enforcement mechanism like there is for regular laws? I mean, t
143.
by Kamq 3y ago
Here's one of the studies I'm basing it on (this one is most in depth, but also only covers the Czech Republic): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-010-9696-y I can drum up a couple more if
144.
by Kamq 3y ago
Given that access to porn is strongly negatively correlated with violent rape across most cultures I've seen studied, I'm not sure you should be cheering this.
145.
by Kamq 3y ago
That seems like it would require the damage done to be equivalent to the cost of an ad (which can fluctuate wildly). That seems unlikely. I'm not going to get into if it would be higher or lower, but both of those seem way more likely
146.
by Kamq 3y ago
I gave VSC a shot. It's the stupidest thing, but I just can't get over how the side bar (not the file explorer, but the little activity bar that you can open the file explorer/plugin menu/etc from) keeps re-appearing eve
147.
by Kamq 3y ago
Huh? There's plenty of ready clients and servers. It's limited to those that are primarily interested in text (and the occasional image). Which probably prevents it from ever going mainstream (and thus an eternal september). What
148.
by Kamq 3y ago
So, basically how people use python now?
149.
by Kamq 3y ago
Nobody is forcing youtube to respond to my https request either. If they wanted, they could lock it down and force you to log in and agree to a bunch of rules in order to use the service, but they don't.
150.
by Kamq 3y ago
> They don't? Why not? Because it's my device. If youtube wants to not send me the video, that's perfectly within their rights. But once they've sent the video, their rights end unless they have a contractual agreemen

More ›