Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
KPGv2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
391.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
Redditors are anything but harmonious with each other
392.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
It takes place in the UK, which many Europeans (British and non-British) do not include when they say "Europe."
393.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
The second sentence is not true in the EU and Japan, two regions that actually care about end users.
394.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> TypeScript is indeed Javascript No, no. JavaScript is TypeScript. TypeScript is not JavaScript. > type annotations are not code Of course they are. If they weren't code, then a malformed type would not trigger an error. You c
395.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
Well he only needs to write one mistake-free page at a time. On page two, a mistake, you just stat page two over again. But your point about doing 1300 of these is well-taken. (For what it's worth, this would be easier with a fountain
396.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> the problem in that picture is the belief (whichever level of the management hierarchy it comes from) that you can introduce technical impediments against every instance of stupidity one by one until morons are no longer able to stupid
397.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
It's because corporate IT has to service non-tech people, and non-tech people get pwned by tech savvy nogoodniks. So the only sane behavior of corporate IT is to lock everything down and then whitelist things rarely .
398.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
they've reached a local maximum and the only simulated annealing in their party (Trump) doesn't care about this issue at all.
399.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> If you go to a hospital in the United States, it's a lot of old people getting expensive care. You think hospitals aren't full of old people getting care in other countries? And do you think it's possible that young peop
400.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> and no corrections There of course could have been 100 corrections. He just threw those papers out and started again. Which is what we old timers did when we wrote things that we wanted to look nice. I did this with every math assignme
401.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> If you are using JSDoc and you get squigglies or intellisense or any other similar features, you are using TypeScript. This is true in the same way you are "using" C++ if you are on Windows. When most people say "use XY
402.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
I don't understand why someone would opt for "write Typescript, but add a bunch of extra characters, make the syntax clunkier, and throw away all the benefits of compile-time errors because we'd rather have runtime errors&quo
403.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
It is TypeScript in the same way my rear end is the Grand Canyon: they are somewhat isomorphic but one is much less pleasant to look at.
404.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> They are both TypeScript. I take issue with this position because this seems to imply "PureScript and JavaScript are both JavaScript" is a true statement merely because one of them turns into the other with tooling.
405.
▲
by
KPGv2
10mo ago
> This is why I don't use an os that depends on cloud functionality built into the os for much of its fuctionality. macOS doesn't require this. My Apple account has a handful of apps purchased over the years, and that's it
406.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
> which always creates a shallow copy of the book instance properties, thus nullifying any benefits of the flyweight pattern No, the opposite: it highlights the benefits of the flyweight pattern. The shallow copy saves memory. That'
407.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
Okasaki's is basically the Bible for this stuff. Anyone writing data structure libraries in a functional language will have read this or have it on their to-read list.
408.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
because they have low demand, meaning they would lose money if the price were lower
409.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
I sat in my kid's extracurricular a couple months ago and had an FBI agent tell me that Grok was the most trustworthy based on "studies," so that's what she had for her office.
410.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
OTOH it has the richest man in the world actively meddling in its results when they don't support his politics.
411.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
Also studying for eight months is not useful. Loads of traders do this well for eight months and then do shit for the next five years. And tellingly, they didn't beat the S&P 500. They invested in something else that beat the S&
412.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
> must be plausible, need not be accurate This includes IME the initial stages of art creation (the planning, not generating, stage). It's kind of like having someone to bounce ideas off of at 3am. It's a convenient way of trig
413.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
> whatever high salaries they do give us just flow right back into the neighborhoods through insane property values and other cost-of-living expenses that negate any gains. So, it’s always just the few of us who can win that lottery and
414.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
Without turning this into a brag session, this is my experience. I don't have to worry about money anymore, so I get to work on cool projects at my own pace, do things that probably sound pointless to most, and it doesn't matter i
415.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
The obnoxious one here is the person obsessed with monetization, not the person who throws their ignorance back in their face. Every hobby these days has to be monetized; it's fucking gross.
416.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
I recently bought this book for my kids. Somehow I've never read it in forty years. What's the big deal? It's gotta be the most famous book I've never read.
417.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
Your criteria for "perpetual license" requires immortality. I don't see a justification for that, or a possibility.
418.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
> SSDs have all but replaced hard drives when it comes to primary storage. Really? I could have sworn that primary storage was the one place they weren't going to replace HDDs. Aren't they more of a thing for cache? I've
419.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
> What's the point of buying something if the other person is allowed to steal it back. Well in the case of the very thing we're talking about, the point was apparently to make $330 million in a single year in the 1980s
420.
▲
by
KPGv2
11mo ago
The US actually has done this very thing since Reagan: https://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_Executive_Order_12291_(... That's an executive order (regulation) requiring proposed regulations undergo a cost-benefit analys
More ›