Juliate

18 ms·

121.
by Juliate 1y ago
Totally agree, and it's an intermediary step, but it's still not the same. I mean, it's terrific to have an affordable replica, especially for discovery, I'm not debating the price-point advantage (for both acquisition a
122.
by Juliate 1y ago
No, indeed, but^W and that would be an interesting use case. What would a dedicated social media device work, and look like? (actually, that may depend a lot on what privacy one can expect out of it)
123.
by Juliate 1y ago
Definitely agree too. Budget is definitely not the same. And something like VCVRack is heaven to learn, experiment and understand what one can do with synthesis, step by step.
124.
by Juliate 1y ago
Yes! But, huge but, very huge but, you lose the affordance of the switches and the buttons and the knobs and the patch cables. And that is a terrible loss for fiddling and discovery.
125.
by Juliate 1y ago
Tangentially related, I've read recently (Twitter? article?) someone longing for having separate devices again: one for music, one for social networks, one for photography, one for email, etc. Because unifying everything down to a sing
126.
by Juliate 1y ago
> it's tough to figure out a business model that would cause a company like OpenAI to distribute weights they worked so hard to train. It sounds a lot like the browsers war, where the winning strategy had been to aggressively push (
127.
by Juliate 1y ago
1/ any day that includes a single meeting (related or not) should be marked as fully unavailable. So if you have planned meeting in a week, group them (but not all of them on a single day either) and mark that day as unavailable. That
128.
by Juliate 1y ago
Can a highly aggressive species plundering all of the resources avoid self-suicide by destroying the very conditions of its existence? Considering multiple invasive animal species, and past and current humans societies fate… the answer seem
129.
by Juliate 1y ago
You make a false dichotomy first, with an additional straw man, and continue in a circular argument. This alone renders your conclusion unsupported regardless of your premises. Then you mistake what could be a rather evasive appeal to autho
130.
by Juliate 1y ago
You are stating that a specific segment of human experience and knowledge is a cult, without a sensible argument, and as displaying a very astute contempt and seeming lack of experience towards this segment. With an absolutist stance. And t
131.
by Juliate 1y ago
What you're describing is how the interview process _is_ disconnected from the actual needs, and how it's good to literally "play the game" to get in. But on the other side, that kind of interview process is itself also
132.
by Juliate 1y ago
Not a matter of taste: a matter first of own experience. I don’t know if you lack anything there. What you say is indicative of such a lack of it. And your conclusion is obviously negated by history and experience itself. And your final env
133.
by Juliate 1y ago
I am not accusing, I am perceiving that from your stance. No. You should derive from that that human life, and humanities being part of that, are a matter of experience, more than of argument/convincing. I could spend some time to argu
134.
by Juliate 1y ago
> In a similar manner, arts now [...] Really, it's quite a stance to not have a background in arts and history of the arts, and perhaps epistemology as well, and writing this.
135.
by Juliate 1y ago
Humanities are far, far more than "wordplay".
136.
by Juliate 1y ago
Rigor is not enough to build durability and sustainability. You learn that when you learn to build structures. It's not even metaphorical.
137.
by Juliate 1y ago
> No. Coding is mathematics. The internet exists because of engineering. The web was invented because of physics. Maybe, only maybe, getting to know the history of the internet (oh, and of mathematics, too), of the people that designed a
138.
by Juliate 1y ago
Who would, in their decent mind, worship a (all powerful and knowing?) god that satisfies itself with the very concept of losers? That's not a god you're after, it's a (very telling) flag.
139.
by Juliate 1y ago
Not the best paid, but unless you want to live within Paris, it becomes a confortable revenue. In France, you are considered rich when your net revenue is twice the median. That is to say, if you get more than ~4000 € of _net_ monthly salar
140.
by Juliate 1y ago
An email newsletter is boring if it's a (rehash of a) RSS feed. It starts to become interesting when it is its own kind of writing format (that is a bit different from a blog post).
141.
by Juliate 1y ago
(login-required label?) Which is equivalent to saying goodbye to accountability, since no one reasonably can review code generated and validated by ... code.
142.
by Juliate 1y ago
Given your take, it sounds more like... "porn of the arts"? (as in, it mimics and exaggerates the thing but is always a caricatural, aimless distortion of the real thing, that can be only used as a tool for... something; but is st
143.
by Juliate 1y ago
> leading AI pioneer Citation needed. > its cleverest individual I am not sure the recent public displays of the quality of judgment of said individual are demonstrative of a particular high level of cleverness. > "How do you
144.
by Juliate 1y ago
Depends. Do you _know_ you're wrong in the first place? Does anyone else _know_ you are? What's the scope/impact of the issue? Independent from these, staying silent means you resolve to manage on your own your guilt. And thi
145.
by Juliate 1y ago
I thought this was going to be about fixing our trajectory on Earth, and species/ecosystems survival, and it starts, again, with AI and projections that are effectively far beyond the horizon of most of the current species on Earth, wi
146.
by Juliate 1y ago
> Amazon redefined convenience. SpaceX [...]. Apple [...] What about the negative externalities? Are those all factored in the wealth? Oil/coal have been opportunities to create whole wealth empires. Have they been worth it for ever
147.
by Juliate 1y ago
"Jurassic of Us" has a catch too.
148.
by Juliate 1y ago
Thanks for exemplifying the problem: the culture of might over right (I don't know if you realise how deep the "nothing about what you said matters" runs). The family is totally owed information from the police and the state.
149.
by Juliate 1y ago
Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't thought the pro gun/militia type was consistent with pro trump/conservative.
150.
by Juliate 1y ago
The 4th amendment reads easy enough to me. Yet, I understand that case law might be debatable. And that deep political forces are at play. Still, a state were police can operate (out of probable cause) without judicial support is just a pol

More ›