Jtarii

11 ms·

331.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
If your internet died you would likely be worse at programming that you were in 2020. I think is what people are getting at.
332.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
It's like a genotype/phenotype distinction, the genotype may be statistical text generator but the phenotype is something much more.
333.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Having a new insight that leads to the combination of two distinct ideas is definitionally creative. You can say this problem needed a low amount of total creativity, but saying it's void of all creativity seems wrong.
334.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Adding complexity to software has never been easier than it is right now, we really have no idea if the models will progress to the point where they can actually write large systems in a maintainable way. Taking the gamble that the models o
335.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
>What's the worst potential outcome, assuming that all models get better, more efficient and more abundant Complexity steadily rises, unencumbered by the natural limit of human understanding, until technological collapse, either by
336.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Raylib is for hobbyists that want control over everything, but don't want to go through the hassle of dealing with DirectX/OpenGL. It isn't competing with Unreal/Unity at all.
337.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
It's more using LLMs like a metal detector, rather than digging through the entire beach by yourself. You still need to check the junk you dig up using the metal detector.
338.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
>Right now, after pirating it, I have to find the author's patreon / something and contribute some money that way. It shouldn't be this hard to give someone money Why not just buy the thing you are pirating? That would see
339.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Would assume the top amateur players that don't play professionally.
340.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Generative art has negative value, saying it has no value is far too generous. It actively makes the world a worse place.
341.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
AI output is obviously transformative and would be protected by fair use. The argument is about whether the training data was stolen. (which it was)
342.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
>Like if I see some art in a museum and it inspires me to create some of my own, I would need to pay a licensing fee to the original artist? Nope, humans are admitted for free :). >And what about the artists that inspired them? There
343.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
I'm more reacting to the premise that society is positively adapting to the post truth world. Which it clearly is not. Half the population of the US is already living in a fake news mirror universe where everything is inverted. More co
344.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
>All of the critically acclaimed puzzle games seem to be sokobans Wouldn't really agree considering: Antichamber, The Witness, Talos Principle, Manifold Garden, Portal, Zachtronics, Tunic, Blue Prince, Return of the Obra Dinn, Seanc
345.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
The connection with the artist, directly, or across space and time, is a critical part of any artwork. It is one human attempting to communicate some emotional experience to another human. When I watch a Lynch film I feel some connection to
346.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
I would rather see a MS word poster than be lied to.
347.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Do you think you could explain all AI behaviour by reading a physics textbook?
348.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
>society has adapted very well to the understanding that images can't prove anything without detailed provenance Donald Trump is the president of the United States.
349.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
You are vastly, vastly underselling what is being lost. You can no longer look at a piece of art without first asking "is this even real", that is a collosal loss to the experience of being human. You can't just appreciate an
350.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Ok.
351.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
So the benefits are that something that was already being mass produced with no issue is slightly easier to mass produce? It's not a particularly compelling argument.
352.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
The girls that have to deal with their classmates generating nudes of them for the rest of time are glad to hear that their concerns are "overblown".
353.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
If you want to say the complete destruction of truth is worth it because some people are having "fun" then idk.
354.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Think of a movie. You had literally -zero- input in what your brain gave you as an answer. It just gave you something, you can make up whatever story you want to tell yourself, "it's my favourite movie", "I saw it last w
355.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
When someone asks you a question in what ways are you not an "autocomplete"? You aren't aware of how you come up with the words you are saying, you just start talking and the next word somehow falls out of your mouth. Maybe y
356.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
You can't understand human behaviour by reading a physics textbook.
357.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Never understood that if statement style, it seems to only exist to create subtle bugs.
358.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
I think AI is super cool and use it everyday, I also think its likely to cause extreme human suffering. If AGI is let loose on the world I am confident millions of people are going to die.
359.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
The same way humans deal with it, check it against multiple reputable sources.
360.
by Jtarii 6mo ago
Also aren't models like Mythos capable of checking for poison data on their own at this point?

More ›