Joeboy

34 ms·

481.
by Joeboy 5y ago
I think maybe you're talking about this: https://futurism.com/person-furious-right-click-saved-precio... Which strictly speaking is about the art being "stolen", not the NFT.
482.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Also Ardour (which is GPL'ed and runs natively on Linux as well as Windows and Mac) is currently growing Ableton-like features: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiwUN7hz6eU
483.
by Joeboy 5y ago
I think this might have to be the winning answer for me.
484.
by Joeboy 5y ago
It's paid which is a bit off-putting, but maybe I shouldn't be so cheap. Edit: It looks like it's backed by git so maybe it could be used for free, with a bit of faffing. Unfortunately I'm cheap and lazy.
485.
by Joeboy 5y ago
What I'd like is an easy way to keep my notes synced on my laptop and my android phone. I suppose I could install git on my phone and do it that way, but maybe there's a less faffy way I'm missing?
486.
by Joeboy 5y ago
That'd also go for TERFs (or GC people or whatever), right? I sort of agree, in that the groups are composed of individuals and it's not entirely fair to hold them responsible for things they didn't personally do. I also thin
487.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Well that sounds bad if true. I have never heard of this happening and the only violence I'm aware of in my circles has been in the other direction (there is an actual criminal conviction involved).
488.
by Joeboy 5y ago
> My feminists can beat up your feminists. They in fact have in the past.
489.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Well, I've been hanging around feminist women for some decades and my perception of events is that a significant proprtion of women who used to just be called feminists now get dragged for being TERFs.
490.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Going with that comparison, it's like having an especially vicious rage towards feminist women who are homophobic, despite almost everybody else also being homophobic.
491.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Is it, though? I mean if somebody steals your private key, does it make sense that that would give them legal rights / ownership to your NFT'd artworks? I'm honestly not sure if this is a thing, or a legally sensible idea.
492.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Recommend Ian Hubert's "Lazy Tutorials"[1], although they're not really so beginner friendly. More for inspiration and entertainment. [1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4Dq5VyfewIxxjzS34k2N...
493.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Maybe, but the closest I've heard of is contracts explicitly stating that the NFT doesn't assign any legal rights to the work. I'm not sure if the opposite exists / makes legal sense.
494.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Like this? https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1448066579611234305
495.
by Joeboy 5y ago
This kind of makes me want to replace all my profile pics with NFT'd images. I suppose that would be petty.
496.
by Joeboy 5y ago
The thing I found intriguing about this is it implies some sort of vague stigma to using NFT'd images, eg. setting them as your profile picture on twitter, unless you paid for them. Are there really people who would think ill of you fo
497.
by Joeboy 5y ago
I like my Snark, but I'm a bit troubled by the instructions saying not to leave it on any instrument with a polyurethane finish, which I think is most guitars. Not sure how much I should worry about that.
498.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Tuning a guitar (or other stringed instrument) so that the strings are more or less in tune with each other is a really basic skill that even very amateur players can mostly do. Being able to tune to an absolute pitch without any kind
499.
by Joeboy 5y ago
This is extremely cool. Many years ago I started and abandoned a similar kind of thing. The plan was to have support for LV2[1] plugins, so you'd get something like a Mod Duo[2] (itself very cool), but like this in that'd boot fas
500.
by Joeboy 5y ago
No, but drama does require drama . People having a nice time together is not dramatic .
501.
by Joeboy 5y ago
It's an obviously absurd claim.
502.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Oh that does look interesting actually. Loses a couple of nerd points (and I guess probably adds some boot time and latency) due to being Linux-based and not bare metal. But it does look versatile and cheap (although the kit still seems a
503.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Apologies. It seems like your link is your co-founder trying to promote his Hollywood startup, rather than an accurate assessment of how things are currently done in Hollywood.
504.
by Joeboy 5y ago
> Black Widow was fully created with motion capture ("pre-visualization") before a script was even written. That sounds very unlikely and I'd need a better citation. And pre-visualization doesn't really mean what they
505.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Whatever. Black Widow was not "fully created with motion capture before a script was even written." Obviously.
506.
by Joeboy 5y ago
That's the same as what they said, isn't it?
507.
by Joeboy 5y ago
I know I'm a hopelessly naive hippy, but isn't there some option where we make our case by saying things that are true, rather than saying things that are untrue but alarming in the right direction? I feel like I personally would
508.
by Joeboy 5y ago
Well, posting the actual content publicly would obviously make it public, which registering a hash on the blockchain would not. "Sending it to yourself through the mail" would probably be the competition, and I would say a cryptog
509.
by Joeboy 5y ago
I can't say for sure what a judge would make of a cryptographically secure hash of a piece of content that there's no record of prior to the hash's registration on a blockchain. I think if somebody tries to claim authorship o
510.
by Joeboy 5y ago
It sounds like you're talking about cases where, as I said, there's "earlier evidence of somebody else being the creator of the work". In the absence of that , I think the token would be a decent piece of eviden

More ›