Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Jochim
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
151.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
Yes, yes, don't think, just mock. People being defrauded, injured, poisoned, and dying must be much more efficient. That's the reality that drove the formation of these agencies. I'm sure an inability to trust the safety, qua
152.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Raw milk products are routinely consumed in France, I've never heard of someone getting sick from it. Raw milk itself is not routinely consumed though. Apparently, 95% of the milk used by consumers is UHT[0]. People do get sick fr
153.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Why would you ban restaurants entirely because people might get sick eating from one every so often. We do "ban" restaurants that sell to consumers while failing to take the proper precautions in the storage and handling of f
154.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Why can't the consumer decide who is lying and who isn't and what is safe and what isnt Expertise, incentive, and efficiency. We had the approach you suggest, we got rid of it because we tired of people dying. I greatly enjoy
155.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Could those consumers just go for pasteurized milk and let others have the choice they want? People can have the choice they want. It requires that you shoulder the risk yourself, rather than having it pushed on you by someone who is
156.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> But why can I not purchase raw dairy that I know to be raw and produced in good condition? Because the people selling it routinely lie about it's safety and health benefits as compared to pasteurised milk. I don't support tha
157.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
They can be revoked though.
158.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
Mozilla's argument isn't that you'll be tracked or fingerprinted. It's that you're too stupid to be permitted control over whether or not you want to allow access to devices you've connected to your machine. Ra
159.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> This looks to have better software with it though. I get that you can probably port between but i'm happy to pay a few dollars to save my own time here. There's no porting involved, you'd literally just flash the chip th
160.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
Not a product in itself but I've seen one used to prototype an automated testing solution for existing hardware. I'm not sure why it'd be particularly surprising? Their whole thing is being easy to use and quick to iterate wi
161.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
As far as I know, you have to reload the page sadly.
162.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I'm hoping to push us that way, some hurdles with getting buy in from the whole team though. That's why I wish DevOps made it a really clear cut choice. There's some really low hanging fruit and silly decisions that spoil the
163.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I moved from Azure to AWS. App Insights, DevOps pipelines, and WebApp slots look like future tech when compared to codepipelines and x-ray. DevOps in particular feels so close to being a really great tool. Not having to jump between 8 diffe
164.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I use FF and prefer the devtools. Chrome's ability to temporarily edit and save changes to JS sources through the debugger editor is fantastic though. Other than that it's mostly just improvements to what FF already has. Search co
165.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
Firefox has been my browser of choice since I switched from Internet Explorer as a child. However, I've found their refusal to implement or offer alternatives to WebSerial and screen-casting utterly depressing. It's made a number
166.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I hesitate to blame the audience when vendors are all too keen to force the transition themselves. See Adobe, Microsoft, and Atlassian's discontinuing/restriction of on premises licenses for their products. People often seem to ha
167.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
The phone contacts and social graph of everyone using WhatsApp.
168.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I don't think I've ever seen anyone under the age of 40 play Candy Crush.
169.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
It depends on the engine but indy studios are frequently able to port to all of the major platforms: PC, Xbox, PlayStation, and Switch. The exclusive addressable market for each is definitely big enough to outweigh porting costs. A good fir
170.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
Game streaming is a great option to have but it incentivises the same behaviour we've seen from companies that move to a SAAS model: Charge a monthly fee and remove the option to own the product. Not actually owning the games is a prob
171.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I'd rather we were transitioning towards consumers actually owning their games rather than towards them not being able to run them on their own hardware. We've already seen how this plays out with the proliferation of SAAS and the
172.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> But my favourite example of trains done right is Japan, and to my surprise, their expansive rail network is dozens of private companies. It turned a lot of my assumptions upside down. My impression is that in Japan, there are social re
173.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Just browsing the comments on this one, it struck me how users of this website, an incubator for new technologies and ostensibly private businesses, seems to not believe in the capacity of private businesses to provide the most sociall
174.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Restructure and run those service companies until they're profitable. Finally sell them, or better yet over the span of the years get the employees to get a sizable ownership share, give local go another sizable share, sell the re
175.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
Advertisers never push people to do the sensible thing though. There's a reason that "vice" advertising has so much money poured into it. The gym advertising its memberships would rather you never set foot on their premises
176.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
People will continue to blame workers regardless. Central banks will continue to raise interest rates, squeezing consumers, and debt laden companies will increase prices further to compensate. The UK has already seen retail volume decouple
177.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> To be clear, the failure was not in the act of selling itself, but in the decision to not reinvest the proceeds into new housing stock. This is the part that made the housing problem worse instead of better. The kind of mass sell-off t
178.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
> Space is limited by regulation and zoning. 90% of the UK is rural. Market rates are high because of the supply not matching the demand, or being allowed to match it. This does not square with the fact that private builders are leaving
179.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
I don't necessarily agree. Different countries have different issues but in the case of the UK neo-liberal policy has clearly been the root cause. Social housing stock was sold off, ostensibly to occupiers, at significantly less than m
180.
▲
by
Jochim
3y ago
There's a limited amount of space and a non-negligible portion of society are unable to afford market rates. When the state doesn't build accommodation, citizens end up transferring ludicrous amounts to private landlords to house
More ›