Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
JimBastard
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
Yeah good luck with SeedStart Summer Program..... why don't you ask them who the winners were last year? there weren't' any. Owen and his buddies are just culling NYC for possible good ideas to poach, huge waste of me and my teams time. fro
32.
▲
Need to send emails from node.js to an smtp server?
(github.com)
1 points
by
JimBastard
17y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
javascripts
34.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
ZOMG THE INTERNET HAS WORMS
35.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
i see you are incapable of understanding the word "pretend" or visualizing n-problem scenarios....if you still don't get it...i give up... and im using this code in production.....and its working out great......its a really simple concept..
36.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
How would you load that CSS file dynamically into your DOM? pretend you had 1,000,000 CSS classes that could be used in your one-page JavaScript application. you cannot load all of these with <link> on page load.......too much data.
37.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
you could implement a parser that used .addClass() and .removeClass() instead of .css() if i release an official parser i think it would use those methods. the whole point is to store your CSS in JSON and parse it with JS, the libraries use
38.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
lolwut? i'll agree with you that c++ is faster then jQuery....good day
39.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
thank you!
40.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
i appreciate you took the time to read through everything and respond so throughly, but you seem to be missing the whole point. you can try re-reading the comments on this thread but if you've never dealt with really rich javascript apps, i
41.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
1. jQuery and sizzle are pretty fucking fast 2. if you cant separate your business logic from your views....you have bigger problems to deal with....
42.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
if used in conjunction with a traditional CSS framework and you require javascript for your page, there are really no dis-advantages. in my rich internet applications i will use traditional CSS for the initial "base" state of the applicatio
43.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
as the article states, "CSS frameworks (haml, sass, less) are meant for server-side templating and we need client-side templating." this is intended for client-side templating and dynamically assigning CSS classes and properties at run-time
44.
▲
JSON stylesheets - screw CSS frameworks, use JavaScript - JSSS
(maraksquires.com)
16 points
by
JimBastard
17y ago
|
35 comments
45.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
Doesn't node come with a built in chat server demo? http://github.com/ry/node_chat
46.
▲
Awesome old-school debug console for managing node.js instances
(maraksquires.com)
23 points
by
JimBastard
17y ago
|
0 comments
47.
▲
by
JimBastard
17y ago
The photo uploader is the first step towards them taking over the browser completely. They will trick users into using this and start dark testing new features, over time they will replace the majority of the browser's built-in rendering en