Jevon23

13 ms·

91.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Unfortunately, you’re right. These models are beneficial to large corporations, and they do the most harm to the small individual artists who created the content that made them possible in the first place, so it’s unlikely there will be any
92.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Hopefully you understand how artists feel about DALL-E and Midjourney now.
93.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Good! Large corporations shouldn’t be able to profit off of other people’s data without consent or compensation.
94.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Plato would never write this crap.
95.
by Jevon23 4y ago
There would be no point in keeping the human players around. You may as well just watch the computers play each other (which some people already do, occasionally). We’ve long since passed the point where humans can improve on the moves sugg
96.
by Jevon23 4y ago
If I can take copyrighted images and feed them into an AI, why can’t I take any code I find online and ignore the license terms and feed it into a compiler? How do you justify the existence of something like the GPL?
97.
by Jevon23 4y ago
>What if I read the code, understand its concepts, and re-implements another library that provide similar functionality without directly linking to the original repository, that is not an infringement I agree, that's fine. The analo
98.
by Jevon23 4y ago
I'm not a lawyer and I can't say how existing copyright law applies to this situation, but, how is taking images and feeding them into an ML model different from taking library code and including it in your software? In both cases
99.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Is it “holding back progress” to ban the use of engines in chess tournaments?
100.
by Jevon23 4y ago
The impression that I’m getting from a lot of the comments here (and a lot of past discussions about AI art on HN) is that tech people view the art industry as a “challenge”, and they want to use machine learning tools to “defeat” it - eit
101.
by Jevon23 4y ago
That’s definitely part of it, yeah. There’s other factors too, but that’s obviously one of the big ones. So what? FurAffinity’s stated goal with the ban is to protect human artists. Obviously banning something that undermines human artists
102.
by Jevon23 4y ago
I'd be curious to see if you could get that from the AI as well. I tried generating that exact prompt a few times at theartbutton.ai and all the results were nonsensical. For example: https://theartbutton.ai/image/
103.
by Jevon23 4y ago
It's not a nitpick. It might be a nitpick if hands were the only thing it couldn't do. But it struggles with a lot more than just hands. >the tech scales so well as to make their new goalpost irrelevant in a year. This just b
104.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Well, we’ll see how it performs, if it’s ever made public. The 20B images don’t look that much more impressive than what SD is already doing (aside from the ability to render text), and in some cases they look worse. It’s hard to tell becau
105.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Are you under the impression that right now, as of today, the publicly-available AI models are ready to replace humans for all types of art outside of scientific and technical illustration? Because that's not true at all. The AI can&#
106.
by Jevon23 4y ago
>It's going to destroy the livelihoods of the majority of independent artists in a way that looks inevitable to me. Why is SD going to destroy the livelihoods of artists when machine language translation hasn't put human transl
107.
by Jevon23 4y ago
With the models that are available for public use today, there are still usually signs, particularly when it comes to drawings of humans.
108.
by Jevon23 4y ago
They can just focus on obvious cases: people that upload new images at an astounding rate, people who forget to remove the AI watermarks, and people who simply admit to using AI. No need to turn it into a witch hunt where you accuse everyon
109.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Have your website block visitors from California. Problem solved.
110.
by Jevon23 4y ago
They delivered technology that everyone would have said was sci-fi ~5 years ago. I think some confidence is deserved at this point. I personally remain skeptical of the claims that the singularity is just around the corner though.
111.
by Jevon23 4y ago
>The other side of the coin is creating new jobs for people with good visual taste and imaginative ideas, who did not pass the skill barrier previously required to actually create good art. I mean. Do you think that there are people out
112.
by Jevon23 4y ago
Well it’s already been trained on millions (billions?) of images and it still has trouble with plenty of things. Scenes with more than one person in them, or multiple people and objects interacting in complex ways, are the most obvious case