Jerrrrrrry

11 ms·

91.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Thank you for your comments (good further reading terms), and your open invitation for continued inquiry. The "fomo" / deja vu / impending doom / incipient shift in the Overton window regarding meta-architecture for
92.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>but more sophisticated in that it contains more baked-in wisdom you can't beat Shannon's limit, or the 2nd law of thermodynamics, no matter how much you allow "sophistication" or "wisdom" to do the
93.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>A vessel to cross the street. I literally cannot source this pun, and my ego refuses to believe you can had been this clever. "Ogres are like onions! They have layers, just like onions. You get it? We both have layers&q
94.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
holy fuck this was the most based fucking thing i have read in a long time
95.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>To give an illustrative though not very realistic example, you might realize you didn't actually need a web backend at all and that the app can function local-only. ssshhhh, don't give away the only secret that keep
96.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>If you think about it: I genuinely stopped reading there somehow subconsciously, and have a lil read to do, thank you.
97.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
yes, got me there. but i feel in the context (communication/meta-data inference) that is missing the trees for the forest
98.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
meta-whataboutism
99.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
I 100% agree with this but that is almost as if to say, "lrn2code", which cannot work at scale, being the sole benefit of a particular memetic virus.
100.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>cognitohazard I had my own self-looping self-referencing rumination once when I was 7-10. It was essentially "the game" but more of a cognito-hazard time loop. It is, however, axiomatically true that you can ruminate
101.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
No point in storing data if it is never shared with anyone else. Whom it is shared with can infer the intent of the data.
102.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Lol I love how you were sincere (seemingly) and I still got negged and flagged
103.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0TYWcxRyak Your snark and lack of benefit of the doubt is telling.
104.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
List my arguments. and I hadn't done something that I will do, because those are difference tenses. try harder.
105.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
not even a good troll bro
106.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
the backrooms is a meme named from a subset of it, named informally long ago. "5" years old is when normies appropriated it, which explains your ignorance.
107.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
That isn't simpler, nor logical. Simpler is that I am right and they are in denial. And if they didn't want to waste their time arguing, they could had at least used the time they did forfeit to make a single point. But go ahead,
108.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
yes, because things dont exist before they have names. subliminal spaces spawned the idea, long before moot left.
109.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
None of the replies were answers, just deflections. You cannot reflect on a deflection, that is oxymoronic. I have made clear, concise points, and 0 of them were addressed, merely dismissed. I have biases, I even admitted insofar as calling
110.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Electronic Arts has been, and still is, vulnerable from its Xbox gateway. I legally/ethically/mentally cannot read this article but if its not related, there is more work to do. Not that anyone should do it for EA, but for the col
111.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Definitely a "fun" way of looking at it. Parasocial FOMO escalating into actually affecting lives negatively. Remember the slender man murders? how fun!
112.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>but I thought we were better than this (Whataboutism) at HN. Whataboutism is Whataboutism.
113.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>The Backrooms started with a 2019 post. I'd tell you what we used to call people like you, but its a no no word now cuz feeels. 2019? What are you, 20 years old?
114.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>Setting Skibidi Toilet aside That was the #3rd item, close. >you really that confident that misinformation, hate speech and historical revisionism Are you not? These are the excuses our nation has used to justify the l
115.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
You should engage in good faith and not imply shit. Attack my arguments on their own merits. And if you are too cowardly/moral to do that, remember what the power "harmless memes" have, next time you call someone president. M
116.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
It's not comparable, and everything you said was objectively false.
117.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
This was the only comment that was substantive, non-dismissive, thought provoking, and worth it's weight in literal bits. I actually open any hypothesis you have, because this level of mexa-reflection is too difficult for the average H
118.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
downvotes without replies mean you agree and are too cowardly too admit either defeat or to cognitively dissonant to respond
119.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>Poor fanfic long predates the "Backrooms" phenomenon. Its not harmful, or unique to our culture; its just cringe. It is unique, it is harmful, and your bias of "cringe" indicates something you are too coward
120.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Yall should run your own experiments and let the Backrooms' endless datum of frivolous fictitious information stunt a child's most crucial time of intellectual growth, facilitated by an indifferent giga-corp specializing in robbin

More ›