Jensson

19 ms·

421.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Anthropic would probably not renegotiate in a year about the principles, while Sam Altman is known to be morally flexible so OpenAI will almost surely allow the military to do what they want in the future. Sam Altman might even have said be
422.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Sam probably told them they can renegotiate those restrictions in a year or so when the drama has died down.
423.
by Jensson 8mo ago
> "Dumb beyond belief" doesn't perform at the gold-medal level at IMO. Idiot savants are still idiots even though they are exceptional at some things. A person powered by an LLM and no human intelligence would absolutely b
424.
by Jensson 8mo ago
But normal people doesn't care about the art establishment, it has no impact on their lives, it could die tomorrow and almost nobody would notice.
425.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Are you a woman? If not you can't really judge it since it was intended for women, not being the target audience doesn't mean it was bad, women absolutely loved the movie.
426.
by Jensson 8mo ago
So about 10%, using it less than once per day means you didn't find it useful for most tasks.
427.
by Jensson 8mo ago
> If there is $270B in equity invested, making those 5% back should be rather straightforward for someone with that much wealth, a decent wealth manager would recoup that easily. Money makes money. Its his voter shares, he wont get them
428.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Google is doing that, you know all those "I am not a robot" things? Those are made by google mostly and uses a lot of such signals. Its not just clicking the right things its also how you click etc. The reason some of those just h
429.
by Jensson 8mo ago
> You can't change or fix people who have their vote. Mental models are rigid, and people are, broadly speaking, emotional and irrational. They vote vibes, not facts. So, "what do?" as the kids would say. So don't pre
430.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Well some people are stubborn but most do the switch to better designed items. So its not really subjective, the initial knee jerk reaction is but the more reasoned response after a few years isn't very subjective.
431.
by Jensson 8mo ago
> This feature fires on actual bugs; it's not just a model pattern matching saying "what a bug hunter may say next". You don't think a pattern matcher would fire on actual bugs?
432.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Why can't you write that? It is much more accurate than their own version since what they wrote is very suggestive while this is just describing what happened.
433.
by Jensson 8mo ago
But the argument is that now you have AI for chef, staff and upkeep so its only the recipe writer left. I don't agree with that argument but that is the dream these corporations are selling.
434.
by Jensson 8mo ago
You never needed AI to make shovelware, you have been able to make a shitty game over a weekend ever since RPG maker was made and there are still games made using that. AI just helps create some assets for games, it doesn't really make
435.
by Jensson 8mo ago
You don't even see ads for local restaurants, you just go there because its close or a friend recommended it. How could you get influenced by something that doesn't exist? Their marketing is just the storefront, people go there si
436.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Creating marketing material has certainly gotten easier as well, it used to require a lot of work to create these spam pamphlets and company documents but today its trivial. Of course those are worthless to society so didn't help GDP b
437.
by Jensson 8mo ago
You don't need a source for that, an LLM with such little data is barely able to form proper sentences.
438.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Thats UK after they left EU.
439.
by Jensson 9mo ago
Lots of people have jobs today thanks to high level languages that wouldn't have a job before them, they don't need to know how to manage memory manually. Maybe that will happen for LLM programming as well, but I haven't seen
440.
by Jensson 9mo ago
Can you name an example? Who do you know that made more money by using LLM?
441.
by Jensson 9mo ago
How is a C compiler novel? There are so many open source C compilers. If you can download a bunch of different open source projects and they all work then it is not a novel problem, it is as solved as you can get already.
442.
by Jensson 9mo ago
And that is harder than just doing it manually, hence saying that hard parts are harder. If you have a clear picture of what you want it to do then its harder to vibe code than to code it yourself.
443.
by Jensson 9mo ago
When you use it to lookup a single word, yeah, but people here use it to lookup thousand words at once and then can't check it all.
444.
by Jensson 9mo ago
> Models do not need to hold the whole code base in memory, and neither do you Humans rewire their mind to optimize it for the codebase, that is why new programmers takes a while to get up to speed in the codebase. LLM doesn't do th
445.
by Jensson 9mo ago
> Similarly, some use the same word for blue and white, and are unable to perceive them as different colors. You really think they can't see clouds in the sky because they have the same word for white and blue? I think you take thos
446.
by Jensson 9mo ago
> I just don't like blaming capitalism in the abstract because it doesn't have to be like this. We can change it. But saying that Facebook or Myspace wasn't that bad does nothing to support this position, so why did you br
447.
by Jensson 9mo ago
> I agree, but what would be the actual mechanism that would allow that? Governments saying "if you are a social content platform with more than XX million users you have to provide these options on recommendation algorithms: X Y Z&
448.
by Jensson 9mo ago
> because you're trying to squash this into "capitalism bad". I never said "capitalism bad", I said it optimizes for profits and that it gets better at that over time, that is not bad or good, that is just what i
449.
by Jensson 9mo ago
I don't see any harm that could come from saying "a less addictive algorithm needs to be available to users"? For example, lets say there is an option to only recommend videos from channels you subscribe to, that would be muc
450.
by Jensson 9mo ago
And that is why these algorithms needs to be regulated. People don't want to pick the algorithm that makes them spend the most time possible on their phones, many would want an algorithm that optimizes for quality rather than quantity

More ›