Jenk

14 ms·

121.
by Jenk 3y ago
I use plugin for FF (also chrome) that does this automatically. Can be configured to use any nitter instance: https://github.com/SimonBrazell/nitter-redirect
122.
by Jenk 3y ago
> I'd be shocked if there was a ZMK keyboard out there you couldn't flash. MoErgo Glove80 is ZMK based. Extensible and flashable, too.
123.
by Jenk 3y ago
https://archive.ph/9pz3M
124.
by Jenk 3y ago
Probably a confusion of what that percentage is - whilst the monthly figure is as you have said, the accumulated/aggregate percentage of inflation over those two years is probably what GP refers to as 18%
125.
by Jenk 3y ago
In about the same time frame someone offered me 16,000 BTC for a mediocre graphics card I put on a listing. (I turned it down.)
126.
by Jenk 3y ago
git help -a lists all available commands. It's important to note that the git binaries are (usually) both client and server - by design what with the hole "decentralised" thing. So the default package will let you r
127.
by Jenk 3y ago
Keep it with the "but iPhones get all smudgey from my fingers, yuck" bookmarks.
128.
by Jenk 3y ago
This reads like a chapter out of my own biography. This experience started on a self-hosted SVN + Hudson server (not VM). That server was repurposed to run ESX that the hosted the VM of its former self. Which felt a bit pointless. Then we m
129.
by Jenk 3y ago
I didn't expect to laugh but the screenshot (i.e., pure white rectangle) has tickled me.
130.
by Jenk 3y ago
Apologies, I didn't mean breaking TLS itself but breaking the trust that said protocol is providing. Thanks for explaining.
131.
by Jenk 3y ago
My niaive understanding is that all certs contain (at least) the id/thumb of their issuing cert - If I am not mistaken, how is TLS broken by sending only the leaf and/or intermediary if the client is able to correctly identify the
132.
by Jenk 3y ago
SmallTalk has the left-to-right for everything principle because everything is message passing and "operators" are just binary (as in two argument) messages which catches many out. 2 - 1 * 5 will return 5, while many woul
133.
by Jenk 3y ago
From zero tests in 2019, to some 59k+ tests in just 4-5 years. On an established, significantly large product no less. Yeah I have zero faith in the quality and efficacy of those tests.
134.
by Jenk 3y ago
Hey I didn't say Google were any better. I am also posting these remarks with a tongue in cheek. I am sure they (any) do liaise with government agencies when requested but not that they are primarily intel branches with a retail mask.
135.
by Jenk 3y ago
> Quite curious why it hasn’t been sued yet by the DOJ. A single corporation owns the proprietary OS running what must be upwards of 80% of the world's corporate and government workstations that is known to be laden with copious amo
136.
by Jenk 3y ago
Par for the microsoft product course. They are the 80%ers - all of their products achieve ~80% of their potential. Some might argue that's just being prudent and shipping only the minimally marketable features but my riposte to that is
137.
by Jenk 3y ago
> You don't get to resolve yourself of ethical obligations Forming an argument with the unfounded pretense that everyone is obliged to donate is somehow not claiming everyone is obliged to donate. Yet somehow I'm the disingenio
138.
by Jenk 3y ago
The expectation (that every singke viewer is obliged) is the recent fad, not the concept of donations. Are you deliberately obtuse or just incapable of distinguishing the two? Not irrelevant nor a stawman, but does show the fault in your
139.
by Jenk 3y ago
It makes all the sense. There is no subscription fee. There is no premise nor expectation of payment by the viewer. They get paid as a consequence of people viewing, ahead of time by sponsors, or as a payment in lieu by ad monetisation - or
140.
by Jenk 3y ago
To be fair/devil's advocate - "GUI" has been phonetically pronounced as "Gooey" by many people since inception, thus I think it is entirely reasonable for them to have adopted this name entirely unaware of the
141.
by Jenk 3y ago
YouTube pays contributors a tiny fraction of their ad revenue in order to make more ad revenue. Sponsors pay them to include their products. So yes, it does hold up to scrutiny. YouTube and sponsors are paying them. I am not obligated, ethi
142.
by Jenk 3y ago
None. They put their content out on a platform that does not require my contribution. YouTube was, and is, never about "compensating content creators" and I am under no obligation to do so, but they get paid anyway. Some get paid
143.
by Jenk 3y ago
The HR bot use case is very close to my domain - literally one of the teams reporting to me are maintaining the HR bot for a large enterprise - and it is a legal minefield. Whatever the bot provides as a response could be legally binding, a
144.
by Jenk 3y ago
Thanks, updated the link.
145.
by Jenk 3y ago
It is a practice called anchoring. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring_effect
146.
by Jenk 3y ago
Apprenticeships are open to 16 year-olds - in much more dangerous professions. Metalworking, construction, mining, etc. And of course if it is deemed too dangerous for them to join any of these professions, your local military recruitment c
147.
by Jenk 3y ago
Because that's how the numbers are arranged on the clock face/sun dial
148.
by Jenk 3y ago
TV stations use this system. A schedule for any given day can be up to 27 hours iirc.
149.
by Jenk 3y ago
> Most people can’t Bias. Most people can. I'm in the UK, too.
150.
by Jenk 3y ago
And yet we have survived with the convention that 12AM is midnight, and 12PM is noon for centuries. Noon is also not "12:00" - it is the infinitely small moment at the strike of 12:00. Instantaneously it becomes post-meridiem . 1

More ›