JeffSnazz

13 ms·

121.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
> And tbh, I don't understand the urge of people to defend broken hash functions. Just use a safe one, even if you think you "don't need it". The ideal discourse would not imply a binary sense of "safety" at
122.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
> My first thought seeing this was that it validates that new apps from now on will be LLM-integrated from the start. Why not, right? LLMs used right are a great UX-improvement for almost any app. Well, any apps that you can actually bui
123.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
The impulse to punish other minor infringers more rather than to fix obviously antisocial draconian punishment will never cease to mystify and befuddle me.
124.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
> I imagine that Google would lose a bunch of users if they suddenly started to expire those cookies lol
125.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
The cross-platform "OpenGL successor" seems to be gfx-rs. It's not clear why one would expect a specific vendor to champion this.
126.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
We'd have to compare against a similar poll from decades ago to figure out if this true—it could be it used to be that 40% of kids didn't believe in it.
127.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
That's probably why they killed it—it gave the end user too much control over content they consume and how they consume it. And of course you can't tell what they actually read or when....
128.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
> This is a fable. No, it's a myth, or even better, a common misconception. A fable is a morality story.
129.
by JeffSnazz 3y ago
> But then what? Presumably you could use techniques for discouraging pests we (the public) understand better. You can do this for any class of substance, though this isn't always possible (e.g. good luck replacing cancer medication