JMCQ87

8 ms·

31.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
I don't see how B) would work in this case. However, it could also simply be a huge pile of money getting burned, with a few useful innovations made along the way. I would venture to say that is the most likely outcome, actually, altho
32.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
Short term is relative, I suppose.
33.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
That actually gives a neat amateur-ish impression. ^^
34.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
Pretty hard to imagine that there will be anything actually "self-sustaining" on Mars anytime soon.
35.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
Yupp, there's enough precedent with Parse alone.
36.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
Maybe it's still news to some people that there's plenty of precedent for that? For every Litvinenko there is 100s or 1000s that died in more subtle ways.
37.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
No, I think legality - in this case - should be pretty clear.
38.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
You're allowed your quota of one medium-impact dissident action per week, just like everyone else. As it helps to keep up maintaining the illusion of democracy and free speech, you are actually doing your country a great service. If yo
39.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
I hope that was sarcastic. Otherwise it's hilarious, especially in this context.
40.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
The UK is even more one-sided totalitarian in their views on state surveillance, so you got a point there.
41.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
The only one I find surprising among those three is Soros. He's a pretty Janus-faced individual though in general, so... maybe shouldn't even find that surprising anymore.
42.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
They should be condoning it. For that, a lot of things would have to change first though, like, for example, the community has to come to the realization that the (supposed) ends do not justify the means and that it's therefore the rig
43.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
Maybe he would have a tragic car accident, or commit suicide.
44.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
If you want to go to places where there hasn't been any terrorist attack nearby, you don't have many places to go to left. Irrational fear, a car accident is the far more likely option to die.
45.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
It's mentioned in the article... ;)
46.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
>I put it to her that all of that doesn't sound very average to me. >She pauses and laughs sheepishly. "I guess it just depends on who you're comparing me to." That's the key thing. If I compare myself to the
47.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
Depends on us if that's the end of history, or just a stage though. ;)
48.
by JMCQ87 10y ago
The interview has some interesting points, this headline is just what he has been saying for years though.
49.
by JMCQ87 11y ago
Not even Trump would make we want to work in adtech.
50.
by JMCQ87 11y ago
That was my first thought, too. ^^
51.
by JMCQ87 11y ago
... and then someone else submits it and it gets like 5 votes, so you can't complain anymore that you don't get on there. ;)
52.
by JMCQ87 11y ago
Voat is not "forgotten about", it just doesn't have any mainstream appeal. The activity now is mostly from groups of users that have become "unpopular" on Reddit.
53.
by JMCQ87 11y ago
Not only to you. Homepage or no homepage is a pretty staggering difference in "vote-weight".
54.
by JMCQ87 12y ago
Yeah, and this person supposedly believing in "merit" wants you to buy into his vision based on fluff and hype.
55.
by JMCQ87 12y ago
Better journalists, or just critical thinkers, too. This person drank a bit too much of the valley kool-aid already, it seems.
56.
by JMCQ87 12y ago
Didn't know they had connections to HBGary at some point. Quite telling, if you dealt with these "bottom of the barrel-guys". I pitched in front of some people from ManTech once and knowing that they acquired HBGary made me s
57.
by JMCQ87 12y ago
Unbelievable that this can be legal.
58.
by JMCQ87 12y ago
Looks reasonably useful. What would be alternatives to this and what sucks/is great about them?
59.
by JMCQ87 13y ago
Since you implemented all those tools, the next obvious question is: what does the data say? ;)
60.
by JMCQ87 13y ago
If you look into what the actual outcomes of "charity" and development aid are in the third world, this makes perfect sense.

More ›