JI00912

11 ms·

61.
by JI00912 5y ago
> See for example the prison system: do want people to suffer or do we want them to return as reasonably normal members of the society? Unfortunately, this idea has not worked out. If you look at people who have been convicted a few time
62.
by JI00912 5y ago
If dosed properly, it could have made a substantial positive impact. Certainly there is risk involved, but then most things are risky when running a business. Going for safety leads to employment, not to running a company.
63.
by JI00912 5y ago
Someone may have known what they were doing...
64.
by JI00912 5y ago
Probably not, but they also weren't good at keeping time.
65.
by JI00912 5y ago
Settled? We don't even understand what 'will' is because we don't understand what it means to think. We haven't began answering the question because we don't know where to start.
66.
by JI00912 5y ago
It would be great if we could all just turn to an objective entity with all the facts. But there's no such person. Certainly not the average journalist. There's just no such thing as a fact checker.
67.
by JI00912 5y ago
I maybe misunderstanding this post, but Facebook information about covid and the last us election has been terrible.
68.
by JI00912 5y ago
We remember people for their meaningful contributions, not for _everything_ they did. Take a look at any historical statue, for instance. What does it do? It captures some moment in time that we find significant. That thing becomes somethin
69.
by JI00912 5y ago
"Outed", "reveled", etc. The purpose of this type of language is to influence people. In other words, it's propaganda.
70.
by JI00912 5y ago
Yes. People even argue with themselves while projecting on other people.
71.
by JI00912 5y ago
There are few things more funny than joking about serious things. Like it or not, that's how it is.
72.
by JI00912 5y ago
Person using definition A: Yes it is! Person using definition B: No it isn't! --- Actual situation: Different people using the same word to refer to different things.
73.
by JI00912 5y ago
You're spreading prejudice, conspiracy theories and hatred.
74.
by JI00912 5y ago
Because the doses provided are a function of how well the tool chain works and not of weather or not they have to meet a particular target or at what level the target is set.
75.
by JI00912 5y ago
> The employee was a civil servant Apparently he wasn't. :)
76.
by JI00912 5y ago
> the point of the legal proceedings is to make it mandatory for AstraZeneca to provide the doses set out in its EU contract The point of a contract is always that fulfilling the contract is mandatory. That said, legal proceedings won&#x
77.
by JI00912 6y ago
Nothing is safe. Everybody dies.
78.
by JI00912 6y ago
> We forced the world after 9/11 to block anonymous Internet. This is just wrong. Whenever I travel I just get a 30 day or so SIM card. They've available everywhere. Not to mention WIFI access points here and there, e.g. at hot
79.
by JI00912 6y ago
Can website owners do anything to hinder this Google surveillance network? E.g. feeding it bad data. And I don't mean opting out. Asking them nicely and hoping they respect that is not good enough.
80.
by JI00912 6y ago
On an individual level it doesn't. It takes time and makes such a small difference that it's pointless. Google knows this of course. The result is that they can claim people can opt out, while in practice they run a giant surveill
81.
by JI00912 6y ago
Because people wouldn't. :)