Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
JAlexoid
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
They're not 20% less, they're a third of the price of a new one.
92.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
From what I see, the majority of HDDs on Amazon are now used devices. Which isn't necessarily bad... HDDs have a much longer lifespan than SSDs. I expect my used HDDs to last at least 5years in my RAID5 setup.
93.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
This law is dumb, because in no way does it prevent the exact same data to be collected, processed by a US entity and then transferred to China. I suspect that it's not about data being transferred, but the fact that TikTok can shape o
94.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
I'm pretty sure that he didn't liquidate $50bn in stock to get the money for buying twitter. (That $50bn includes the 20% capital gains tax, that leaves $40bn in cash)
95.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
That's pretty cool. - What did you use to prototype your project? What software and what companies offered prototyping services for your project? - Was it hard to get the whole machine made? How is the market for small scale manufactur
96.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
> Personally, the low-tech solution of a plunger stuck to my forehead with a klondike bar dangling from the end has always worked for me. Or you could borrow someone's labrador retriever and have the dog pull you. They like to go re
97.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
You're right... Companies should pay mid 6 figures, as well as downtime for training. Short answer is that most corporations don't have a job in training people.
98.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
As someone who went though the legal means when he was in the office last time, he will primarily hurt the legal immigration... because that is the easiest thing for them to do - grind USCIS to a halt.
99.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Well.... DUH! You're comparing the vast swathes of mediocre talent to the best from the rest of the world. Of course the top talent from elsewhere is going to beat the average talent from the US.
100.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
I literally quit my previous job, because people were hired after "a few Coursera courses". Sorry, if you "learned online" and haven't spent a few years building software - you aren't immediately as qualified
101.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
> H1B visas suck for IT and software workers. H1b only sucks for short sighted people. Places like India would in any case have more software engineers available, than the US. Moving and hiring best of Indian engineers in the US kept tea
102.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
>Any offspring also doesn't qualify for citizenship. Literally anti-constitutional.
103.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Fist - it is not companies' responsibility to train anyone. It is not their business. Second - H1b are exploitable, because the system allows it. H1b has demonstrably not suppressed software engineering wages at all. Non-competes, have
104.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
> Modern "platforms" sponsor content and push what they want, much like magazines and TV outlets. They aren't magazines or TV, where everything is under editorial control. Not to mention, that magazines and TV outlets are
105.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
There are exclusions to this law, that obligates establishment of reasonable measures and adherence to take down rules. (That's why we have DMCA, that actually offers indemnity for copyright violations)
106.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
No. And you literally wrote why... Algorithmically promoting something isn't a matter of an opinion expressed by the company. But neither is a company liable just because they engage in moderation.
107.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
> they're already exercising the power you'd prefer they not have Maybe you would prefer they wouldn't have it, but I prefer that private companies run their moderation as they see fit for the market.
108.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Companies are already responsible for what they post.(see Dominion lawsuit) Companies aren't, and should not be, responsible for what other people post on their websites.(See Section 230 prehistory)
109.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
With vast swathes of people who DGAF about freedom of speech and just want to punish the other side - midterm elections aren't likely to produce any sort of a counterbalance.
110.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Section 230 doesn't indemnify anything. It recognizes that a platform is just an intermediary, not the originator. Similar provisions are in place in most of the civilized world.
111.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Not when your competition are consumer companies like Google, Microsoft and Apple. I'm on Google One at $100 per year, getting more services than Dropbox can offer with their $120 plan. Maybe they have a future in enterprise sales, but
112.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Your presumption is that it's about the money for everyone. But there's a lot more at play when you are rich enough to not worry about money.
113.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Why would you fire your best and brightest? That would be like throwing out good fruit, when there are spoiled ones. No, it's a very poor idea to force companies to lay off at random.
114.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
There's empirical evidence to knowing what you actually want, vs what you say you want. And I've made a lot of money on disregarding maximalist user requests, thank you very much.
115.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
> I'm sad that Netflix&Co. do not publicize their urls/intents/etc. for smart TVs. I'd be happy to call an episode directly. That is an intentional marketing move. If you bypass the loading screen, you're als
116.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
This is literally what good editorial is. That's what makes best articles in journalism. No one, including you, is interested in every single detail. And no one, including you, will read a novel for every single game.(and every single
117.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Recaps are boring. They are intended to be. If you want the drama, that permeates any soccer game - you watch the game, read a 10 page review or watch a long review video.
118.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
Or... We can have 1 highly paid specialist review recaps and adjust the prompt to the LLM, instead of 100 low paid disinterested writers producing crap articles(like they already do today) Why should we race to the bottom to just employ peo
119.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
> It's a software bug Why is it a software bug? Just because you want to see those emotional sprinkles, doesn't mean that the person planning how to create the article decided that. You personally and emotionally decided, witho
120.
▲
by
JAlexoid
2y ago
That's a "kitchen sink" approach, that produces really bad articles that are hard to read.
More ›